<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Move Over Intel &#8230; AMD &#8230; P.A. Semi Rules!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2005/10/24/move-over-intel-amd-pa-semi-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2005/10/24/move-over-intel-amd-pa-semi-rules/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2005/10/24/move-over-intel-amd-pa-semi-rules/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2005/10/24/move-over-intel-amd-pa-semi-rules/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The first chip will be dual-core, and  the microprocessor will also include the functions of two other support chips.  The chip will run at 2.5 gigahertz, but will only consume 5 watts to 13 watts – compare that to the above Intel or even AMD numbers.&lt;/em&gt;

Let&#039;s read some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT102405055354&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;informative articles&lt;/a&gt; before blogging, shall we?!

&quot;The initial implementation is depicted below in Figure 2 and is expected to sample in the third quarter of 2006. It is implemented in a 65nm process and is expected to run at 2GHz, using up to 1.1V and dissipating 25W maximum and 13W typical.&quot;

According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1876371,00.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eWeek&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;The company&#039;s first product, a dual-core 2GHz processor, will consume about 13 watts of power in a typical setting.&quot;

And let&#039;s read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pasemi.com/news/releases/2005_oct_24_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some press release&lt;/a&gt; now:

&quot;It will sample in the third calendar quarter of 2006, with single-core and quad-core versions due in early and late 2007, respectively, and an eight-core version planned for 2008.&quot;

So it goes something like this:

- first samples Q3 2006

- single-core version due early 2007

- quad-core version due late 2007

- eight-core version planned for 2008

The first chip will be single-core, with a dual-core version, and likely run at 2.0 gigahertz. The dual-core version should consume &lt;b&gt;25 watts maximum&lt;/b&gt; (never believe typical power, the real power is always way higher). The chip didn&#039;t tape out yet, so this is only an estimate.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The first chip will be dual-core, and  the microprocessor will also include the functions of two other support chips.  The chip will run at 2.5 gigahertz, but will only consume 5 watts to 13 watts – compare that to the above Intel or even AMD numbers.</em></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s read some <a href="http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT102405055354" rel="nofollow">informative articles</a> before blogging, shall we?!</p>
<p>&#8220;The initial implementation is depicted below in Figure 2 and is expected to sample in the third quarter of 2006. It is implemented in a 65nm process and is expected to run at 2GHz, using up to 1.1V and dissipating 25W maximum and 13W typical.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1876371,00.asp" rel="nofollow">eWeek</a>: &#8220;The company&#8217;s first product, a dual-core 2GHz processor, will consume about 13 watts of power in a typical setting.&#8221;</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s read <a href="http://www.pasemi.com/news/releases/2005_oct_24_1.html" rel="nofollow">some press release</a> now:</p>
<p>&#8220;It will sample in the third calendar quarter of 2006, with single-core and quad-core versions due in early and late 2007, respectively, and an eight-core version planned for 2008.&#8221;</p>
<p>So it goes something like this:</p>
<p>- first samples Q3 2006</p>
<p>- single-core version due early 2007</p>
<p>- quad-core version due late 2007</p>
<p>- eight-core version planned for 2008</p>
<p>The first chip will be single-core, with a dual-core version, and likely run at 2.0 gigahertz. The dual-core version should consume <b>25 watts maximum</b> (never believe typical power, the real power is always way higher). The chip didn&#8217;t tape out yet, so this is only an estimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
