<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1KTags = 1MBucks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:19:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter's Webmaster Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter's Webmaster Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;1000tags - ist Tagvertising das n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1000tags &#8211; ist Tagvertising das n</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>&quot;The guys who did this&quot;... Heh, the domain was registered two days ago and someone with absolutely no relation with the site is advertising it on the blogs he&#039;s seen people talking about 1000tags.

Burn :-P



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The guys who did this&#8221;&#8230; Heh, the domain was registered two days ago and someone with absolutely no relation with the site is advertising it on the blogs he&#8217;s seen people talking about 1000tags.</p>
<p>Burn <img src='http://www.zoliblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t belive in censoring comments, so I wouldn&#039;t delete it even if I thought you were affiliated with them and were promoting your site.

I don&#039;t know what makes it a better concept, to me it&#039;s just another one.  But here&#039;s a clue: it&#039;s not the site itself, it&#039;s the buzz you can generate.  1000tags managed to get the word out bigtime... a Google or Technorati search on Forevertags returns 0 (zero) hits.   I guess we&#039;ll just have to wait and see...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t belive in censoring comments, so I wouldn&#8217;t delete it even if I thought you were affiliated with them and were promoting your site.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what makes it a better concept, to me it&#8217;s just another one.  But here&#8217;s a clue: it&#8217;s not the site itself, it&#8217;s the buzz you can generate.  1000tags managed to get the word out bigtime&#8230; a Google or Technorati search on Forevertags returns 0 (zero) hits.   I guess we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/12/1ktags-1mbucks/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I hate to say it, but a similar effort, that is a copy (or not so copycat? seems a bit original) is already on the run. The truth is that the concept is a lot better. The guys who did this propably know what a tag is... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forevertags.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.forevertags.com&lt;/a&gt;

To tell you the truth, I kind of dislike the concept of &quot;1000 only, 1 million only&quot; and so on. It just gives an expiration date to the whole concept, and looks like the guys who do it are only in for the money. Do it guys, but NOT in a way like say... &quot;Private tags&quot;. Wow! tags are dead by default that way! The only traffic this site gains, is by curius who are dazzled by the MDH success, and want to see it happen again.

Anyway, I am in no way affiliated with the forevertags.com website, and honestly, if you think so dont publish/delete this comment.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it, but a similar effort, that is a copy (or not so copycat? seems a bit original) is already on the run. The truth is that the concept is a lot better. The guys who did this propably know what a tag is&#8230; <a href="http://www.forevertags.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.forevertags.com</a></p>
<p>To tell you the truth, I kind of dislike the concept of &#8220;1000 only, 1 million only&#8221; and so on. It just gives an expiration date to the whole concept, and looks like the guys who do it are only in for the money. Do it guys, but NOT in a way like say&#8230; &#8220;Private tags&#8221;. Wow! tags are dead by default that way! The only traffic this site gains, is by curius who are dazzled by the MDH success, and want to see it happen again.</p>
<p>Anyway, I am in no way affiliated with the forevertags.com website, and honestly, if you think so dont publish/delete this comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
