<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Splogs, Spomments &amp; Spambacks (or is it Trackspam?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/22/splogs-spomments-spambacks-or-is-it-trackspam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/22/splogs-spomments-spambacks-or-is-it-trackspam/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Ryno Pen » Piece of art&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/22/splogs-spomments-spambacks-or-is-it-trackspam/#comment-10415</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ryno Pen » Piece of art&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/22/splogs-spomments-spambacks-or-is-it-trackspam/#comment-10415</guid>
		<description>[...] by spammers and the slimebuckets who leave spomments on my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by spammers and the slimebuckets who leave spomments on my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/22/splogs-spomments-spambacks-or-is-it-trackspam/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/01/22/splogs-spomments-spambacks-or-is-it-trackspam/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>My guess: neither; there is no humour in either of them, nor are they easy to say. To gain recognition and widespread use quickly, a new word would ideally be fun and/or one syllable. You might have opted to try “spackback” instead. Regarding spam comments I believe they will keep being referred to as such until the birth of a good enough word qualifying under either of the above criteria. “Spomment” probably doesn&#039;t.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess: neither; there is no humour in either of them, nor are they easy to say. To gain recognition and widespread use quickly, a new word would ideally be fun and/or one syllable. You might have opted to try “spackback” instead. Regarding spam comments I believe they will keep being referred to as such until the birth of a good enough word qualifying under either of the above criteria. “Spomment” probably doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
