<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jobs Dumps Apple Stock?   Readers Should Dump The Register.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly White</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bad Journalism - Part 2&lt;/strong&gt;

Heh, this is really getting to Scoble . We should now start deriding people who link to non-credible

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bad Journalism &#8211; Part 2</strong></p>
<p>Heh, this is really getting to Scoble . We should now start deriding people who link to non-credible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-318</guid>
		<description>12 July 2006

All I know is that the EC slaps a big fine on MicroSoft and MicroSoft goes down 38 cents and Apple crashes down 2 points....

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 July 2006</p>
<p>All I know is that the EC slaps a big fine on MicroSoft and MicroSoft goes down 38 cents and Apple crashes down 2 points&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>AppleInsider called Investor Relations, who confirmed the story, as well as the fact that the share settlement provisions will be in the 10Q, not the SEC Form 4 you linked to above.

Of course Apple Investor Realations is available to The Register as well, if they care to call...

Until the next 10Q is out, perhaps you&#039;ll except Marketwatch and The Wall Street Journal as &quot;better-than-rumor-site&quot; sources.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AppleInsider called Investor Relations, who confirmed the story, as well as the fact that the share settlement provisions will be in the 10Q, not the SEC Form 4 you linked to above.</p>
<p>Of course Apple Investor Realations is available to The Register as well, if they care to call&#8230;</p>
<p>Until the next 10Q is out, perhaps you&#8217;ll except Marketwatch and The Wall Street Journal as &#8220;better-than-rumor-site&#8221; sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Zoli, do you have evidence for this statement?

&lt;i&gt;Technically, Apple issued than repurchased those shares, then retired them, reducing the number of outstanding shares. It&#039;s not the fact of transaction that&#039;s in question here, but the Register&#039;s reporting it as &quot;stock-dumping&quot;, while it&#039;s a tax-driven transaction.&lt;/i&gt;

You state this as if it&#039;s a fact, but it&#039;s a story from a rumor site that isn&#039;t backed up by any evidence. But you castigate The Register &quot;Readers should Dump The Register&quot; -  for &lt;u&gt;not&lt;/u&gt; repeating this rumor.

The onus is on AppleInsider to back up its unsourced story with proof, surely.

I don&#039;t understand. Please can you explain?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoli, do you have evidence for this statement?</p>
<p><i>Technically, Apple issued than repurchased those shares, then retired them, reducing the number of outstanding shares. It&#8217;s not the fact of transaction that&#8217;s in question here, but the Register&#8217;s reporting it as &#8220;stock-dumping&#8221;, while it&#8217;s a tax-driven transaction.</i></p>
<p>You state this as if it&#8217;s a fact, but it&#8217;s a story from a rumor site that isn&#8217;t backed up by any evidence. But you castigate The Register &#8220;Readers should Dump The Register&#8221; &#8211;  for <u>not</u> repeating this rumor.</p>
<p>The onus is on AppleInsider to back up its unsourced story with proof, surely.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand. Please can you explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Thanks, but the SEC filing is obviously not new information, and it&#039;s certainlu not in conflict with my post.

Technically, Apple issued than repurchased those shares, then retired them, reducing the number of outstanding shares.  It&#039;s not the fact of transaction that&#039;s in question here, but the Register&#039;s reporting it as &quot;stock-dumping&quot;, while it&#039;s a tax-driven transaction.

No, the Register does not have to stick to second-hand rumors, they could simply call Apple&#039;s Investor Relations, that&#039;s what they are for.

Thanks for commenting.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, but the SEC filing is obviously not new information, and it&#8217;s certainlu not in conflict with my post.</p>
<p>Technically, Apple issued than repurchased those shares, then retired them, reducing the number of outstanding shares.  It&#8217;s not the fact of transaction that&#8217;s in question here, but the Register&#8217;s reporting it as &#8220;stock-dumping&#8221;, while it&#8217;s a tax-driven transaction.</p>
<p>No, the Register does not have to stick to second-hand rumors, they could simply call Apple&#8217;s Investor Relations, that&#8217;s what they are for.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Zolli, you&#039;ve made a mistake. The Register based its information &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000118143106019230/xslF345X02/rrd111744.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on this SEC filing&lt;/a&gt;.

The AppleInsider story has NO sources whatsoever - it&#039;s a rumor story on a rumor site.

Are you suggesting The Register should print second hand rumors, or stick to printing verifiable facts? Do you even know the difference between rumor and facts?

It&#039;s a real own goal for the bloggers and Scoble has already apologized.

Maybe you should view this issue more dispassionately.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zolli, you&#8217;ve made a mistake. The Register based its information <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000118143106019230/xslF345X02/rrd111744.xml" rel="nofollow">on this SEC filing</a>.</p>
<p>The AppleInsider story has NO sources whatsoever &#8211; it&#8217;s a rumor story on a rumor site.</p>
<p>Are you suggesting The Register should print second hand rumors, or stick to printing verifiable facts? Do you even know the difference between rumor and facts?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a real own goal for the bloggers and Scoble has already apologized.</p>
<p>Maybe you should view this issue more dispassionately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;And Now, Here They Are, The BEATLES!&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

Those were the famous words Ed Sullivan used to launch the Beatles (already hot in the UK) in the US.&#160; Here they are, back again: Apple vs. Apple.&#160; “IT IS the ultimate battle of the generations over an image of a half-eaten piece of fruit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;And Now, Here They Are, The BEATLES!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Those were the famous words Ed Sullivan used to launch the Beatles (already hot in the UK) in the US.&nbsp; Here they are, back again: Apple vs. Apple.&nbsp; “IT IS the ultimate battle of the generations over an image of a half-eaten piece of fruit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly White</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/03/26/jobs-dumps-apple-stock-readers-should-dump-the-register/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bad Journalism - Part 2&lt;/strong&gt;



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bad Journalism &#8211; Part 2</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
