<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is the World&#8217;s Fourth Largest Server Manufacturer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Google’s DIY Server strategy Mess With Market Stats? &#124; Have Mac Will Blog (.com)</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-7350</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Google’s DIY Server strategy Mess With Market Stats? &#124; Have Mac Will Blog (.com)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-7350</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d recently read that Google is the world’s 4th largest maker of computer servers. The story on Zoli&#8217;s Blog actually dates back to October 2004, so it could be that Google is now actually third (still a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d recently read that Google is the world’s 4th largest maker of computer servers. The story on Zoli&#8217;s Blog actually dates back to October 2004, so it could be that Google is now actually third (still a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Anonymous&lt;/em&gt;, are you Sarge? It&#039;s not easy to figure out what your problem is, unless you say it... but I think I&#039;ve got it.

My post got submitted to reddit, and I guess you must have seen it there (?). But I did not know about it, I just wrote my own post, that&#039;s all.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Anonymous</em>, are you Sarge? It&#8217;s not easy to figure out what your problem is, unless you say it&#8230; but I think I&#8217;ve got it.</p>
<p>My post got submitted to reddit, and I guess you must have seen it there (?). But I did not know about it, I just wrote my own post, that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>point is that coming to this page first is a complete waste of time.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>point is that coming to this page first is a complete waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Sarge, thanks for commenting.  I make no secret of the fact the the NYT article was published before mine, in fact I am openly using them as source and refer readers to the full article.  What is your point?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarge, thanks for commenting.  I make no secret of the fact the the NYT article was published before mine, in fact I am openly using them as source and refer readers to the full article.  What is your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Thats odd, I read that article on reddit a few hours prior to seeing this zoliblog post on here using the same image from the first post.  Nothing new just rehasing a story to draw attention to a lame blog.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats odd, I read that article on reddit a few hours prior to seeing this zoliblog post on here using the same image from the first post.  Nothing new just rehasing a story to draw attention to a lame blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>When RAID emerged there were doubts about it, primarily FUD from the premium storage providers. But as history has shown us, RAID was an exceptional breakthrough for storage reliability. It still runs counter to intelligence in many ways, Centering one&#039;s design on failure stills seems strange.
The concept of arrays of low cost servers/components seems similarly frightening from a design perspective, but in  reality, for the kind of uptimes needed for web applications, it must be centered into anyreliable design. Most server manufacturers however are likely to oppose this failure centric design. After all selling a product designed to fail would not appeal to the big margin server marketeers.
It would be great if a manufacturer could start up with a RAID designed cluster. Sell its servers in small clusters with failover designed in, so that components could be easily swapped on failure (accessable components). Of course for this to work each server and it&#039;s components should be &quot;Inexpensive&quot; as in the &quot;I&quot; in RAID, unfortunately most server manafacturers go for Expensive..
regards
Al

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When RAID emerged there were doubts about it, primarily FUD from the premium storage providers. But as history has shown us, RAID was an exceptional breakthrough for storage reliability. It still runs counter to intelligence in many ways, Centering one&#8217;s design on failure stills seems strange.<br />
The concept of arrays of low cost servers/components seems similarly frightening from a design perspective, but in  reality, for the kind of uptimes needed for web applications, it must be centered into anyreliable design. Most server manufacturers however are likely to oppose this failure centric design. After all selling a product designed to fail would not appeal to the big margin server marketeers.<br />
It would be great if a manufacturer could start up with a RAID designed cluster. Sell its servers in small clusters with failover designed in, so that components could be easily swapped on failure (accessable components). Of course for this to work each server and it&#8217;s components should be &#8220;Inexpensive&#8221; as in the &#8220;I&#8221; in RAID, unfortunately most server manafacturers go for Expensive..<br />
regards<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/07/02/google-is-the-worlds-fourth-largest-server-manufacturer/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Your blog requested authorisation for some reason (username and password) I just dismissed it. Thought I&#039;d let you know as this is unsual for a public blog. You might want to double check you http auth settings.
unless this is some kind on new anti comment spam technique..
regards
Al

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog requested authorisation for some reason (username and password) I just dismissed it. Thought I&#8217;d let you know as this is unsual for a public blog. You might want to double check you http auth settings.<br />
unless this is some kind on new anti comment spam technique..<br />
regards<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 312/316 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.zoliblog.com @ 2012-02-09 23:56:10 -->
