<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wikipedia Enterprise 2.0 Debate &#8211; Epilogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise 2.0 Verden er smartere sammen &#171; Naturglad&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/#comment-6648</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise 2.0 Verden er smartere sammen &#171; Naturglad&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/#comment-6648</guid>
		<description>[...] Artikkelen om Enterprise 2.0 ble opphavet  til en stor prisippdebatt på wikipedia våren 2006. Det viste seg at Enterprise 2.o hadde vært lansert som begrep allerede i 2001, men var ukjent for  søkemotorene på nettet. Kildehenvisninger fra nettet er ikke kvalitetsikret på samme måte som litteraturhenvisninger. Kilder på nettet har ikke samme troverdighet og det er viktig å være kritisk til kilder fra nettet.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Artikkelen om Enterprise 2.0 ble opphavet  til en stor prisippdebatt på wikipedia våren 2006. Det viste seg at Enterprise 2.o hadde vært lansert som begrep allerede i 2001, men var ukjent for  søkemotorene på nettet. Kildehenvisninger fra nettet er ikke kvalitetsikret på samme måte som litteraturhenvisninger. Kilder på nettet har ikke samme troverdighet og det er viktig å være kritisk til kilder fra nettet.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wikipedia Enterprise 2.0 Debate - Again&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wikipedia Enterprise 2.0 Debate - Again&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>[...] it did. The Wikipedia entry on Enterprise 2.0 was allowed to stay.&#160;&#160;Of course as Enterprise 2.0 became “fashionable”, new players claimed ownership, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it did. The Wikipedia entry on Enterprise 2.0 was allowed to stay.&nbsp;&nbsp;Of course as Enterprise 2.0 became “fashionable”, new players claimed ownership, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Software Abstractions Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>The Software Abstractions Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2006/11/25/the-wikipedia-enterprise-20-debate-epilogue/#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.5: The Social Enterprise - Part I&lt;/strong&gt;

A recent Harvard Business School case study of Wikipedia (an interesting read in itself - here&#039;s the epilogue ) has put the term Enterprise 2.0 on the map. Essentially the concept of moving Web 2.0 to the Enterprise, it is

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.5: The Social Enterprise &#8211; Part I</strong></p>
<p>A recent Harvard Business School case study of Wikipedia (an interesting read in itself &#8211; here&#8217;s the epilogue ) has put the term Enterprise 2.0 on the map. Essentially the concept of moving Web 2.0 to the Enterprise, it is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
