<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BobAndJoeSuck.com:  the New Anti-TechCrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/05/bobandjoesuckcom-the-new-anti-techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/05/bobandjoesuckcom-the-new-anti-techcrunch/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/05/bobandjoesuckcom-the-new-anti-techcrunch/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/05/bobandjoesuckcom-the-new-anti-techcrunch/#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; I guess you&#039;re trying to support your point, since you did sign your comment, but I really don&#039;t know if you&#039;re Ann or Jeff (?).

&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a somewhat &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zoliblog.com/blog/_archives/2006/8/12/2225028.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;longer post I&#039;d like to refer to&lt;/a&gt;: in that case an anonymous poster created an attack blog with a single purpose of defaming a company (likely competitor?). He was posing an expert, threw in accusations and personal attacks yet was spineless enough to remain nameless. No wonder the blog disappeared since then.

&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do agree with you that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zoliblog.com/blog/_archives/2006/12/31/2609439.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogs should allow comments&lt;/a&gt;. &#160;

&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I guess you&#8217;re trying to support your point, since you did sign your comment, but I really don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re Ann or Jeff (?).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a somewhat <a href="http://www.zoliblog.com/blog/_archives/2006/8/12/2225028.html" rel="nofollow">longer post I&#8217;d like to refer to</a>: in that case an anonymous poster created an attack blog with a single purpose of defaming a company (likely competitor?). He was posing an expert, threw in accusations and personal attacks yet was spineless enough to remain nameless. No wonder the blog disappeared since then.</p>
<p>I do agree with you that <a href="http://www.zoliblog.com/blog/_archives/2006/12/31/2609439.html" rel="nofollow">blogs should allow comments</a>. &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/05/bobandjoesuckcom-the-new-anti-techcrunch/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/05/bobandjoesuckcom-the-new-anti-techcrunch/#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>&quot;There really should be no room for anonymity in the Blogosphere&quot;

Wait, why? Because some people want to gain personal fame from the Blogosphere? It shouldn&#039;t matter who is making a point, the point should stand on its own - is it valid or not. It doesn&#039;t matter who these people are nor whether they say bad things or good things about people, products, processes, culture or society.

Actually, I think we&#039;d be better off if anonymity was required in the blogosphere - then people wouldn&#039;t have to tolerate certain A list bloggers, just because they are A list bloggers - ideas and opinions might be judged more fairly and there wouldn&#039;t be hero worship.

But I do think that any blogs that don&#039;t allow comments should be boycotted. If they want to sling arrows, they should be man enough to take them, too.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There really should be no room for anonymity in the Blogosphere&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait, why? Because some people want to gain personal fame from the Blogosphere? It shouldn&#8217;t matter who is making a point, the point should stand on its own &#8211; is it valid or not. It doesn&#8217;t matter who these people are nor whether they say bad things or good things about people, products, processes, culture or society.</p>
<p>Actually, I think we&#8217;d be better off if anonymity was required in the blogosphere &#8211; then people wouldn&#8217;t have to tolerate certain A list bloggers, just because they are A list bloggers &#8211; ideas and opinions might be judged more fairly and there wouldn&#8217;t be hero worship.</p>
<p>But I do think that any blogs that don&#8217;t allow comments should be boycotted. If they want to sling arrows, they should be man enough to take them, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
