<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting Children in the 21st Century by Tossing them Back to the 19th Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/15/protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-by-tossing-them-back-to-the-19th-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/15/protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-by-tossing-them-back-to-the-19th-century/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:19:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kerns</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/15/protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-by-tossing-them-back-to-the-19th-century/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kerns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/15/protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-by-tossing-them-back-to-the-19th-century/#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>So is it your opinion, then, that sexual predators are not actually a problem?  Or, just that the federal government has no business looking for ways to protect children from them?

The number of sexual predators being caught lately is both staggering and alarming.  Do a quick google search and I think you may be surprised at what you find.  One shouldn&#039;t be so surprised that people might want to take steps to protect their children and one certainly shouldn&#039;t be so condenscending towards such people.

This bill comes across as a knee jerk reaction to a big problem our society is facing.  I think that is how a great number of our misguided laws came onto the books.

I think that a bill aimed at protecting children from something that a lot of people obviously don&#039;t understand very well  deserves more serious discussion than what you just provided.

Of course, it&#039;s always easier to tear apart other peoples ideas than it is contribute your own.  Isn&#039;t it?

--Chris

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is it your opinion, then, that sexual predators are not actually a problem?  Or, just that the federal government has no business looking for ways to protect children from them?</p>
<p>The number of sexual predators being caught lately is both staggering and alarming.  Do a quick google search and I think you may be surprised at what you find.  One shouldn&#8217;t be so surprised that people might want to take steps to protect their children and one certainly shouldn&#8217;t be so condenscending towards such people.</p>
<p>This bill comes across as a knee jerk reaction to a big problem our society is facing.  I think that is how a great number of our misguided laws came onto the books.</p>
<p>I think that a bill aimed at protecting children from something that a lot of people obviously don&#8217;t understand very well  deserves more serious discussion than what you just provided.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s always easier to tear apart other peoples ideas than it is contribute your own.  Isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/15/protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-by-tossing-them-back-to-the-19th-century/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/02/15/protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-by-tossing-them-back-to-the-19th-century/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ted Stevens And Libraries&lt;/strong&gt;

Okay, I just have a few things to say about this Ted Stevens library banning social media sites, possibly including Wikipedia situation:
The internet is the new library. Whenever I want to research something, do I go to my local library and type someth...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ted Stevens And Libraries</strong></p>
<p>Okay, I just have a few things to say about this Ted Stevens library banning social media sites, possibly including Wikipedia situation:<br />
The internet is the new library. Whenever I want to research something, do I go to my local library and type someth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
