<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati vs. Google Blog Search and the Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:19:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>Dave, I haven&#039;t really checked enough to know how spammy they are.

It helps me in two ways: keyword / expression search, where sometimes other people say smart things NOT on their own blogs but in comments.

The other way is keeping track of myself: when I comment somewhere, forget to set co.mments and later the subject comes up again.. I remember I was part of a relevant comment thread somewhere, just don&#039;t know where:-)

One way for me to filter out splogs is toe set &quot;some authority&quot; vs. &quot;any&quot;.  This is one of the reasons I am still using Technorati, vs. Google.  Sadly, as of a few weeks, it no longer remembers my default setting:-(

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I haven&#8217;t really checked enough to know how spammy they are.</p>
<p>It helps me in two ways: keyword / expression search, where sometimes other people say smart things NOT on their own blogs but in comments.</p>
<p>The other way is keeping track of myself: when I comment somewhere, forget to set co.mments and later the subject comes up again.. I remember I was part of a relevant comment thread somewhere, just don&#8217;t know where:-)</p>
<p>One way for me to filter out splogs is toe set &#8220;some authority&#8221; vs. &#8220;any&#8221;.  This is one of the reasons I am still using Technorati, vs. Google.  Sadly, as of a few weeks, it no longer remembers my default setting:-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>Zoli,

Near as ew can tell, Google is indexing all the RSS feeds it can see from a blog, which often includes comment feeds (for blogs that have comment feeds).  We looked at that and decided that those feeds were, on the whole, really spammy.

But I&#039;m always open to revisiting that decision.  In what way do you find that the comment results on Google helpful? Do you find them spammy, or non-spammy? What are some searches that you do where you find the results from comments useful?

Thanks again for your great feedback.  I really appreciate it, especially all the constructive feedback on how we can get better!

Dave

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoli,</p>
<p>Near as ew can tell, Google is indexing all the RSS feeds it can see from a blog, which often includes comment feeds (for blogs that have comment feeds).  We looked at that and decided that those feeds were, on the whole, really spammy.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m always open to revisiting that decision.  In what way do you find that the comment results on Google helpful? Do you find them spammy, or non-spammy? What are some searches that you do where you find the results from comments useful?</p>
<p>Thanks again for your great feedback.  I really appreciate it, especially all the constructive feedback on how we can get better!</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s numbers appear to be scr***d.   But that&#039;s somewhat beyond the point anyway.  I&#039;ve always recognized Technorati as the innvation leader.  There is a reason I keep on focring myself to use Technorati, and that reason is the superior features / filtering ..etc.  But it is a frustrating experience, and this morning was no different, having timed out just accessing the main technorati.com page.  Charts or not to show otherwise, this is my experience and it never happens with Google.

Now, the one exception to Technorati&#039;s superioriry in features: comment search.  This is big, and Google now provides it, while you don&#039;t.  I hope you won&#039;t let them get away with this for long :-)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s numbers appear to be scr***d.   But that&#8217;s somewhat beyond the point anyway.  I&#8217;ve always recognized Technorati as the innvation leader.  There is a reason I keep on focring myself to use Technorati, and that reason is the superior features / filtering ..etc.  But it is a frustrating experience, and this morning was no different, having timed out just accessing the main technorati.com page.  Charts or not to show otherwise, this is my experience and it never happens with Google.</p>
<p>Now, the one exception to Technorati&#8217;s superioriry in features: comment search.  This is big, and Google now provides it, while you don&#8217;t.  I hope you won&#8217;t let them get away with this for long <img src='http://www.zoliblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/03/technorati-vs-google-blog-search-and-the-conversation/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Actually, you have to dig a little deeper:

Currently (8:18am PDT April 3, 2007):

http://www.technorati.com/search/videobloggingweek2007?authority=n&amp;start=180

shows 193 results.

http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=videobloggingweek2007&amp;scoring=d&amp;sa=N&amp;start=90

Shows 94 results (really only 86, as Google says &quot;Results 81 - 86 of about 94&quot;)

Hope that help.  I suggest attempting to click through deep into the results - you&#039;ll often get a more accurate look at how many results are actually there, as opposed to the estimates that many search engines provide.

Dave

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you have to dig a little deeper:</p>
<p>Currently (8:18am PDT April 3, 2007):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/videobloggingweek2007?authority=n&#038;start=180" rel="nofollow">http://www.technorati.com/search/videobloggingweek2007?authority=n&#038;start=180</a></p>
<p>shows 193 results.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=videobloggingweek2007&#038;scoring=d&#038;sa=N&#038;start=90" rel="nofollow">http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=videobloggingweek2007&#038;scoring=d&#038;sa=N&#038;start=90</a></p>
<p>Shows 94 results (really only 86, as Google says &#8220;Results 81 &#8211; 86 of about 94&#8243;)</p>
<p>Hope that help.  I suggest attempting to click through deep into the results &#8211; you&#8217;ll often get a more accurate look at how many results are actually there, as opposed to the estimates that many search engines provide.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
