Comments on: Webmail: PC Magazine Confuses Productivity with Popularity http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/ Connecting the dots ... Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:19:13 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Gmail Migration Tools Attack Inertia | CloudAve http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/#comment-17534 Gmail Migration Tools Attack Inertia | CloudAve Thu, 14 May 2009 07:07:16 +0000 http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/#comment-17534 [...] years ago I argued that for the productivity-obsessed (like yours truly) Gmail was the clear winner.  But let’s be real, not everyone needs [...] [...] years ago I argued that for the productivity-obsessed (like yours truly) Gmail was the clear winner.  But let’s be real, not everyone needs [...]

]]> By: Google Releases New Zoho Service: Mail with Offline Support | CloudAve http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/#comment-14020 Google Releases New Zoho Service: Mail with Offline Support | CloudAve Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:29:18 +0000 http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/#comment-14020 [...] with all that, why am I unhappy?  I’m a die-hard Gmail fan, mostly for its productivity boosting [...] [...] with all that, why am I unhappy?  I’m a die-hard Gmail fan, mostly for its productivity boosting [...]

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/#comment-1366 Anonymous Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:40:05 +0000 http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/04/11/webmail-pc-magazine-confuses-productivity-with-popularity/#comment-1366 It's hard for non-heavy users to understand why Gmail is the next generation email manager. But that's not a reason to assume it's behind. It’s hard for non-heavy users to understand why Gmail is the next generation email manager.

But that’s not a reason to assume it’s behind.

]]>