<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shareware Awards Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/#comment-18407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/#comment-18407</guid>
		<description>Of course, this doesn&#039;t mean all download/shareware sites were created equal.

I&#039;ve been building my own site for a few years now. The truth is that I don&#039;t have anywhere near the resources needed to manually download each of my 40,000 listings, install them, and try them out. Nor would I be interested in the viruses invariably get installed on that computer as a result.

Does this mean I send out 5-star awards to all the vendors? No, that&#039;s clearly not right and I won&#039;t be doing it. But, like everyone else, I need to find ways to promote my site and what I can do is automate my system to download each file and run multiple virus scans on them. I can then produce a virus-free award and pass that out, hoping the vendors will backlink to my site.

In my view, this does provide a real value, and I&#039;m not misleading anyone. So it&#039;s no surprise that this is what a lot of other download sites are now doing.

Running a site like mine takes an enormous amount of time and expense and the spammers and hackers are worse than ever. And, so far, the site is a long way from paying even for hosting. So, yes, there&#039;s a lot of crap out there, but let&#039;s keep things in perspective and not paint all download sites with the same brush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, this doesn&#8217;t mean all download/shareware sites were created equal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been building my own site for a few years now. The truth is that I don&#8217;t have anywhere near the resources needed to manually download each of my 40,000 listings, install them, and try them out. Nor would I be interested in the viruses invariably get installed on that computer as a result.</p>
<p>Does this mean I send out 5-star awards to all the vendors? No, that&#8217;s clearly not right and I won&#8217;t be doing it. But, like everyone else, I need to find ways to promote my site and what I can do is automate my system to download each file and run multiple virus scans on them. I can then produce a virus-free award and pass that out, hoping the vendors will backlink to my site.</p>
<p>In my view, this does provide a real value, and I&#8217;m not misleading anyone. So it&#8217;s no surprise that this is what a lot of other download sites are now doing.</p>
<p>Running a site like mine takes an enormous amount of time and expense and the spammers and hackers are worse than ever. And, so far, the site is a long way from paying even for hosting. So, yes, there&#8217;s a lot of crap out there, but let&#8217;s keep things in perspective and not paint all download sites with the same brush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backgammon game rules</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/#comment-18480</link>
		<dc:creator>backgammon game rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/#comment-18480</guid>
		<description>I am a newbie in the field of seo and and now i am very much inspired and have a clear vision for my future in this arena known as SEO. I think the most important thing to make it big here is &quot;patience&quot;, if you have that you are a winner here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a newbie in the field of seo and and now i am very much inspired and have a clear vision for my future in this arena known as SEO. I think the most important thing to make it big here is &#8220;patience&#8221;, if you have that you are a winner here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manigordo</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/#comment-16530</link>
		<dc:creator>manigordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/17/the-shareware-awards-scam/#comment-16530</guid>
		<description>There was a golden age of shareware, but now it&#039;s gone; it&#039;s dead. It has been so for quite sometime, I just didn&#039;t want to believe it was. From unscrupulous authors that &#039;pretty up&#039; and repackage free source code, to even more unscrupulous &#039;distributors&#039; that are eager to fill their ad linked pocket. Wasn&#039;t shareware supposed to be the distribution medium on itself; a try before you buy, a word of mouth marketing campaign for struggling programmer&#039;s ventures. These sites are just ad spam galore. I can condone a magazine with an actual media; I might even let it slide for a enhanced enough product; ie cheap, and good enough to pay for... but this sites are just pathetic, with likewise offerings. They&#039;re not even trying to dissimule. The more &#039;respected&#039; ones are just the lackeys of the big boys&#039; little bros&#039; enterprises. Nowadays is all a scam; the line between commercial and shareware has disappeared. Furthermore, their practices are not that much different that malware ridden sites. Eg, the suppa-duppa-anti-spyware-20XX, that either tries to install itself first handedly, or at the very least there&#039;s a banner ad prominently displayed on the page. The program &#039;works&#039; for a while, a kind of expiration date, and then it start to annoyingly informs you that you need to buy the full version; if you&#039;re stupid enough to pay with your own credit card, not only will you have to account for the reg code itself, but the &#039;mysteriously&#039; emptied of it all. If it&#039;s not that, then there&#039;s the ultra-pristine-registry-rub-a-dubber; or something else. That &#039;free&#039; to download program, sure is gonna cost you a lot more down the line. Bottomline; don&#039;t waste your time with most shareware sites; even if they also seem to distribute &#039;freeware&#039;; no matter how &#039;legit&#039; they seem. There&#039;s only a handful of truly respected sites left; but obv can&#039;t recommend those either. If you&#039;re a struggling developer, then I&#039;m sorry to inform you that unless you have no morals, there&#039;s nothing there for you; otherwise submit all you like... and better start thinking in something alternative, maybe in the lines of donationware; or better yet, doing something else altogether. Finally, I know this is kind of necro and tl;dr; yet, I had to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a golden age of shareware, but now it&#39;s gone; it&#39;s dead. It has been so for quite sometime, I just didn&#39;t want to believe it was. From unscrupulous authors that &#39;pretty up&#39; and repackage free source code, to even more unscrupulous &#39;distributors&#39; that are eager to fill their ad linked pocket. Wasn&#39;t shareware supposed to be the distribution medium on itself; a try before you buy, a word of mouth marketing campaign for struggling programmer&#39;s ventures. These sites are just ad spam galore. I can condone a magazine with an actual media; I might even let it slide for a enhanced enough product; ie cheap, and good enough to pay for&#8230; but this sites are just pathetic, with likewise offerings. They&#39;re not even trying to dissimule. The more &#39;respected&#39; ones are just the lackeys of the big boys&#39; little bros&#39; enterprises. Nowadays is all a scam; the line between commercial and shareware has disappeared. Furthermore, their practices are not that much different that malware ridden sites. Eg, the suppa-duppa-anti-spyware-20XX, that either tries to install itself first handedly, or at the very least there&#39;s a banner ad prominently displayed on the page. The program &#39;works&#39; for a while, a kind of expiration date, and then it start to annoyingly informs you that you need to buy the full version; if you&#39;re stupid enough to pay with your own credit card, not only will you have to account for the reg code itself, but the &#39;mysteriously&#39; emptied of it all. If it&#39;s not that, then there&#39;s the ultra-pristine-registry-rub-a-dubber; or something else. That &#39;free&#39; to download program, sure is gonna cost you a lot more down the line. Bottomline; don&#39;t waste your time with most shareware sites; even if they also seem to distribute &#39;freeware&#39;; no matter how &#39;legit&#39; they seem. There&#39;s only a handful of truly respected sites left; but obv can&#39;t recommend those either. If you&#39;re a struggling developer, then I&#39;m sorry to inform you that unless you have no morals, there&#39;s nothing there for you; otherwise submit all you like&#8230; and better start thinking in something alternative, maybe in the lines of donationware; or better yet, doing something else altogether. Finally, I know this is kind of necro and tl;dr; yet, I had to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
