<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP Twice as Fast as Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: slik music chart</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-19065</link>
		<dc:creator>slik music chart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-19065</guid>
		<description>THE PEOPLE AT TWITTER KNOW I DON’T HAVE A FUCKING TWITTER SO FOR THEM TO ALLOW SOMEONE TO POSE AS ME AND ACCUMULATE OVER A MILLION NAMES IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND DECEITFUL TO THERE FAITHFUL USERS. REPEAT… THE HEADS OF TWITTER KNEW I DIDN’T HAVE A TWITTER AND THEY HAVE TO KNOW WHICH ACCOUNTS HAVE HIGH ACTIVITY ON THEM. IT’S A FUCKING FARCE AND IT MAKES ME QUESTION WHAT OTHER SO CALLED CELEBRITY TWITTERS ARE ACTUALLY REAL OR FAKE. HEY TWITTER, TAKE THE SO CALLED KANYE WEST TWITTER DOWN NOW ….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE PEOPLE AT TWITTER KNOW I DON’T HAVE A FUCKING TWITTER SO FOR THEM TO ALLOW SOMEONE TO POSE AS ME AND ACCUMULATE OVER A MILLION NAMES IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND DECEITFUL TO THERE FAITHFUL USERS. REPEAT… THE HEADS OF TWITTER KNEW I DIDN’T HAVE A TWITTER AND THEY HAVE TO KNOW WHICH ACCOUNTS HAVE HIGH ACTIVITY ON THEM. IT’S A FUCKING FARCE AND IT MAKES ME QUESTION WHAT OTHER SO CALLED CELEBRITY TWITTERS ARE ACTUALLY REAL OR FAKE. HEY TWITTER, TAKE THE SO CALLED KANYE WEST TWITTER DOWN NOW ….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google-search-learns-chinese</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-19064</link>
		<dc:creator>google-search-learns-chinese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-19064</guid>
		<description>Google announced on November 2, 2009 that users of Nokia S60 series mobile phones could now search the Internet using voice commands in Mandarin Chinese. -- PHOTO: AFP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google announced on November 2, 2009 that users of Nokia S60 series mobile phones could now search the Internet using voice commands in Mandarin Chinese. &#8212; PHOTO: AFP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNC-2007-11-27 #320 &#124; Geek News Central</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-17285</link>
		<dc:creator>GNC-2007-11-27 #320 &#124; Geek News Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-17285</guid>
		<description>[...] Cool! Guitar Hero it Shreds Desktop Evolution Windows and Mac FeedDemon Calculates Attention Windows XP SP3 10% Faster Robin Good One True Media MPAA Spy Toolkit Credit Card Thieves .01 cents Zoho Writer Work Off line [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cool! Guitar Hero it Shreds Desktop Evolution Windows and Mac FeedDemon Calculates Attention Windows XP SP3 10% Faster Robin Good One True Media MPAA Spy Toolkit Credit Card Thieves .01 cents Zoho Writer Work Off line [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PC Memoirs</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14567</link>
		<dc:creator>PC Memoirs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14567</guid>
		<description>I like XP pro, but Vista looks good, modern. Eventually it will replace XP, but I will keep my XP pro for as long as I can. Vista has some confusing and annoying features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like XP pro, but Vista looks good, modern. Eventually it will replace XP, but I will keep my XP pro for as long as I can. Vista has some confusing and annoying features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Breen</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14118</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Breen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14118</guid>
		<description>OHHHHH, now me getz it lol.A question btw,right now i have a 2.2 cpu dual core nvidia geforce gtx 280 and 4 GB of ram. My speed is sometimes a bit choppy though i just have installed like 17 programs (counting drivers) and i want to use all the ram available for more speed. How can i increase the block or watever that is making the use of ram reduce???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OHHHHH, now me getz it lol.A question btw,right now i have a 2.2 cpu dual core nvidia geforce gtx 280 and 4 GB of ram. My speed is sometimes a bit choppy though i just have installed like 17 programs (counting drivers) and i want to use all the ram available for more speed. How can i increase the block or watever that is making the use of ram reduce???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blakjak</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14116</link>
		<dc:creator>blakjak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14116</guid>
		<description>@ Dr Breen.

Thats the dumbest thing I&#039;ve EVER heard.

That&#039;s like saying that a V8 (insert local rev-head car make here) is faster that my 1100cc motorcycle, because it can make use of more fuel!?!

Vista doesn&#039;t support more ram BECAUSE it uses more, it supports more because it has more memory addressing, it uses more because it is typical MS bloatware.

Gaming doesn&#039;t NEED vista, windowsXP uses up to 3.2GB of ram if your running 32bit, and more than you&#039;ll find in a consumer system when running 64bit. 

So... lets say I have a system that supports Vista. We&#039;ll call it a 3.0Ghz 64bit with 3GB of ram and an nVida 8800GT (with 768MB ram). Now this is well within the specs required to run Vista Ultimate. Anything I do on this system (be it gaming, surfing the net, desktop publishing, developing, other) WILL BE SLOWER under Vista than XP. If we push into the 4gb+ workspace for memory I can use 64bit and anything I do will be slower under Vista than XP. But your argument wasn&#039;t about the performance, cause that&#039;s be proven in benchmarks that XP is fast, you&#039;re talking about ram.

So...say I&#039;m playing spore, which lets you set how much system memory to let the game use to cache graphics, and I have a 4GB system. Because Vista will use at least 1GB of my RAM for pre-read caching and system processes, I&#039;m left with up to 3GB for Spore and any other apps I have running.

Now, say I&#039;m doing the same on XP. XP averages ~200mb ram use (provided you have more than that, XP home will actually run on 64MB, but I digress) when &quot;idle&quot; if any OS is ever truly idle. that leaves me (on 32bit) the same 3GB for my game and apps OR or 64bit 3.8GB for my game and apps.

(I actually run Ubuntu64bit and usually have 2xVirtual Machines, a chat program, a music program, and multiple terminal windows running while I play spore - or any other game - try that on Vista).

The argument that Vista can address more ram in the 32bit version than XP can is really irrelevant to it superiority or inferiority as an OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dr Breen.</p>
<p>Thats the dumbest thing I&#8217;ve EVER heard.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s like saying that a V8 (insert local rev-head car make here) is faster that my 1100cc motorcycle, because it can make use of more fuel!?!</p>
<p>Vista doesn&#8217;t support more ram BECAUSE it uses more, it supports more because it has more memory addressing, it uses more because it is typical MS bloatware.</p>
<p>Gaming doesn&#8217;t NEED vista, windowsXP uses up to 3.2GB of ram if your running 32bit, and more than you&#8217;ll find in a consumer system when running 64bit. </p>
<p>So&#8230; lets say I have a system that supports Vista. We&#8217;ll call it a 3.0Ghz 64bit with 3GB of ram and an nVida 8800GT (with 768MB ram). Now this is well within the specs required to run Vista Ultimate. Anything I do on this system (be it gaming, surfing the net, desktop publishing, developing, other) WILL BE SLOWER under Vista than XP. If we push into the 4gb+ workspace for memory I can use 64bit and anything I do will be slower under Vista than XP. But your argument wasn&#8217;t about the performance, cause that&#8217;s be proven in benchmarks that XP is fast, you&#8217;re talking about ram.</p>
<p>So&#8230;say I&#8217;m playing spore, which lets you set how much system memory to let the game use to cache graphics, and I have a 4GB system. Because Vista will use at least 1GB of my RAM for pre-read caching and system processes, I&#8217;m left with up to 3GB for Spore and any other apps I have running.</p>
<p>Now, say I&#8217;m doing the same on XP. XP averages ~200mb ram use (provided you have more than that, XP home will actually run on 64MB, but I digress) when &#8220;idle&#8221; if any OS is ever truly idle. that leaves me (on 32bit) the same 3GB for my game and apps OR or 64bit 3.8GB for my game and apps.</p>
<p>(I actually run Ubuntu64bit and usually have 2xVirtual Machines, a chat program, a music program, and multiple terminal windows running while I play spore &#8211; or any other game &#8211; try that on Vista).</p>
<p>The argument that Vista can address more ram in the 32bit version than XP can is really irrelevant to it superiority or inferiority as an OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Breen</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Breen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14115</guid>
		<description>Actually, gaming computers NEED vista. Windows XP only uses 2 gb of RAM in total when playing games, using applications, and etc... If u have a high end computer with all the hardware needed for it to support vista, then it is actually a bit better than XP cause the more gb`s of RAM it sucks up the MORE is supported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, gaming computers NEED vista. Windows XP only uses 2 gb of RAM in total when playing games, using applications, and etc&#8230; If u have a high end computer with all the hardware needed for it to support vista, then it is actually a bit better than XP cause the more gb`s of RAM it sucks up the MORE is supported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14066</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14066</guid>
		<description>@Hommous, you are so right. Everyone should build their own computers.  And their car... and their house.  Any monkey can do it.
While at it, why not grow your own food, make your own clothes ..etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hommous, you are so right. Everyone should build their own computers.  And their car&#8230; and their house.  Any monkey can do it.<br />
While at it, why not grow your own food, make your own clothes ..etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hommous habilis</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14065</link>
		<dc:creator>Hommous habilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14065</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan, did you know that NEW computers work better than OLD ones because the technology improves all the time? That&#039;s why new &#039;Vista&#039; computers work better than your old &#039;XP&#039; computer. By the way, Vista isn&#039;t a brand of computer, it&#039;s a COMPUTER PROGRAM or &#039;bloatware&#039; that runs on any computer that costs too much and is not very efficient. Noob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan, did you know that NEW computers work better than OLD ones because the technology improves all the time? That&#8217;s why new &#8216;Vista&#8217; computers work better than your old &#8216;XP&#8217; computer. By the way, Vista isn&#8217;t a brand of computer, it&#8217;s a COMPUTER PROGRAM or &#8216;bloatware&#8217; that runs on any computer that costs too much and is not very efficient. Noob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hommous habilis</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14063</link>
		<dc:creator>Hommous habilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/11/24/windows-xp-twice-as-fast-as-vista/#comment-14063</guid>
		<description>1. Build your own PC (a monkey could do it) 
2. With the 000&#039;s you save, buy a cheap copy of XP Pro off ebay
3. Bathe in your money, and laugh like a loon at the suckers who buy garbage boxes with Vista pre-loaded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Build your own PC (a monkey could do it)<br />
2. With the 000&#8217;s you save, buy a cheap copy of XP Pro off ebay<br />
3. Bathe in your money, and laugh like a loon at the suckers who buy garbage boxes with Vista pre-loaded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
