<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gizmodo Calling Themselves Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/01/14/gizmodo-calling-themselves-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/01/14/gizmodo-calling-themselves-names/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David "Lefty" Schlesinger</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/01/14/gizmodo-calling-themselves-names/#comment-8079</link>
		<dc:creator>David "Lefty" Schlesinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/01/14/gizmodo-calling-themselves-names/#comment-8079</guid>
		<description>Zoli, the core issue here is that this stunt was perpetrated by a couple of the Gizmodo kiddies who had been given, not &quot;blogger&quot; credentials, but actual press passes to CES. They were there as &quot;accredited journalists&quot;, and broke the most basic rule of journalism: the reporter is not supposed to be the story.

Now, Brian wants to portray this as some sort of evidence of their &quot;integrity&quot;, when it&#039;s simply evidence of their complete lack of anything remotely resembling professionalism.

Watching Gizmodo over the past week, I&#039;ve noticed a distinct lack of ads from anyone other than Gawker Media on the site. Taking a look at Alexa, I see a precipitous drop in readership over the past week. Coincidence...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoli, the core issue here is that this stunt was perpetrated by a couple of the Gizmodo kiddies who had been given, not &#8220;blogger&#8221; credentials, but actual press passes to CES. They were there as &#8220;accredited journalists&#8221;, and broke the most basic rule of journalism: the reporter is not supposed to be the story.</p>
<p>Now, Brian wants to portray this as some sort of evidence of their &#8220;integrity&#8221;, when it&#8217;s simply evidence of their complete lack of anything remotely resembling professionalism.</p>
<p>Watching Gizmodo over the past week, I&#8217;ve noticed a distinct lack of ads from anyone other than Gawker Media on the site. Taking a look at Alexa, I see a precipitous drop in readership over the past week. Coincidence&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Nerdy &#124; Gizmodo’s Self-Righteous Claptrap Debunked &#8212; By Gizmodo!</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/01/14/gizmodo-calling-themselves-names/#comment-8064</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Nerdy &#124; Gizmodo’s Self-Righteous Claptrap Debunked &#8212; By Gizmodo!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/01/14/gizmodo-calling-themselves-names/#comment-8064</guid>
		<description>[...] stance on the device. Here&#8217;s their October 2004 review of TV-B-Gone: (thanks to Webware and Zoli Erdos for pointing this out!)  Mitch Altman is an asshole. And not just any asshole, but one of those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stance on the device. Here&#8217;s their October 2004 review of TV-B-Gone: (thanks to Webware and Zoli Erdos for pointing this out!)  Mitch Altman is an asshole. And not just any asshole, but one of those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
