<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows &quot;Live&quot; (Now Dead) Foldershare Has an Architectural Weakness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technology Transfer Services</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-10375</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Transfer Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-10375</guid>
		<description>Why are so surprised by Microsoft and their bugged software? It is something common and I got used to the bugs that exist in Microsoft software. With time you learn that by doing a manual personalized setup you can improve their software considerably but of course the license does not allow you to modify their software... Who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are so surprised by Microsoft and their bugged software? It is something common and I got used to the bugs that exist in Microsoft software. With time you learn that by doing a manual personalized setup you can improve their software considerably but of course the license does not allow you to modify their software&#8230; Who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-9817</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-9817</guid>
		<description>Its clear that ms does not want to support foldershare at all.  The last few big time outages (especially last year) were indicative of a total failure to carry the MS reputation (good or bad, depending how you look at it)into this product.

I think when foldershare was a paid service, the web login authentication was a way to make sure you had a licence and had paid.  Now, its free since the last 4? years, so the web authenticate does not matter or does it?

I also noticed that the link to the foldershare live newsgroup has disappeared from foldershare.com frontpage even though it took them years to create a notifier page and it was only up since the disaster of november last year when the MS lack-of-tech-support team started become verbose.
Obviously, it was too upsetting for them to be reminded again of their failures.
Google can run 24/7 if I am not mistaken so foldershare should manage good uptime as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its clear that ms does not want to support foldershare at all.  The last few big time outages (especially last year) were indicative of a total failure to carry the MS reputation (good or bad, depending how you look at it)into this product.</p>
<p>I think when foldershare was a paid service, the web login authentication was a way to make sure you had a licence and had paid.  Now, its free since the last 4? years, so the web authenticate does not matter or does it?</p>
<p>I also noticed that the link to the foldershare live newsgroup has disappeared from foldershare.com frontpage even though it took them years to create a notifier page and it was only up since the disaster of november last year when the MS lack-of-tech-support team started become verbose.<br />
Obviously, it was too upsetting for them to be reminded again of their failures.<br />
Google can run 24/7 if I am not mistaken so foldershare should manage good uptime as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>What are some of the alternatives to Foldershare?  

I have been using it for quite a while and besides from the occasional outage quite happy.  I would definitely pay for the service if it meant less outages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are some of the alternatives to Foldershare?  </p>
<p>I have been using it for quite a while and besides from the occasional outage quite happy.  I would definitely pay for the service if it meant less outages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Selland</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-9176</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Selland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/12/windows-live-now-dead-foldershare-has-an-architectural-weakness/#comment-9176</guid>
		<description>I gave up on Foldershare a long time ago.  It was a great service when the company was independent and well worth $50/year.  Microsoft bought the copmany, made it &#039;free&#039;, and killed the service - proving that you get what you pay for.  I&#039;d rather pay for a service that works than depend on a &#039;free&#039; service that doesn&#039;t.  Very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up on Foldershare a long time ago.  It was a great service when the company was independent and well worth $50/year.  Microsoft bought the copmany, made it &#8216;free&#8217;, and killed the service &#8211; proving that you get what you pay for.  I&#8217;d rather pay for a service that works than depend on a &#8216;free&#8217; service that doesn&#8217;t.  Very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
