<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Offline: Smart Yet Dumb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will H</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-13009</link>
		<dc:creator>Will H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-13009</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe this still isn&#039;t fixed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe this still isn&#8217;t fixed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oops&#8230;Gmail Has a Penalty Button&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-12942</link>
		<dc:creator>Oops&#8230;Gmail Has a Penalty Button&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-12942</guid>
		<description>[...] be great, for those &#8220;unconnected&#8221; moments (hours), and I certainly hope they will avoid dumb mistakes that made Google Reader almost useless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be great, for those &#8220;unconnected&#8221; moments (hours), and I certainly hope they will avoid dumb mistakes that made Google Reader almost useless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10434</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10434</guid>
		<description>Corvida, here are the Reader Offline instructions:
http://www.google.com/support/reader/bin/topic.py?topic=12013</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corvida, here are the Reader Offline instructions:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/support/reader/bin/topic.py?topic=12013" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/reader/bin/topic.py?topic=12013</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvida</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10433</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10433</guid>
		<description>Oh wow. I didn&#039;t realize you could take your feeds offline and synchronize WITH GReader to a certain extent! Mind informing me of how I can accomplish this?

Great post. Be sure to email the GReader time if you haven&#039;t already, with this post included. Maybe something will happen?

Zentrice with Gmail is my email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow. I didn&#8217;t realize you could take your feeds offline and synchronize WITH GReader to a certain extent! Mind informing me of how I can accomplish this?</p>
<p>Great post. Be sure to email the GReader time if you haven&#8217;t already, with this post included. Maybe something will happen?</p>
<p>Zentrice with Gmail is my email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10429</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10429</guid>
		<description>&quot;instead of assuming its rocket scientists have an algorithm for working out what’s best for us&quot; - especially since those rocket scientists live in al always-connected environment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;instead of assuming its rocket scientists have an algorithm for working out what’s best for us&#8221; &#8211; especially since those rocket scientists live in al always-connected environment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wainewright</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10428</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wainewright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10428</guid>
		<description>I always go to the bottom and read in chronological order, which avoids that problem. But sometimes I&#039;ll go in just to do a quick check of the latest postings and it&#039;s annoying not to be able to simply flag the items I&#039;ve scanned, as I then have to duplicate that work on a later visit. 

Of course what this flags up is that Google should incorporate a Salesforce Ideas-style feedback mechanism for suggesting and voting on enhancements into its GReader home page - instead of assuming its rocket scientists have an algorithm for working out what&#039;s best for us :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always go to the bottom and read in chronological order, which avoids that problem. But sometimes I&#8217;ll go in just to do a quick check of the latest postings and it&#8217;s annoying not to be able to simply flag the items I&#8217;ve scanned, as I then have to duplicate that work on a later visit. </p>
<p>Of course what this flags up is that Google should incorporate a Salesforce Ideas-style feedback mechanism for suggesting and voting on enhancements into its GReader home page &#8211; instead of assuming its rocket scientists have an algorithm for working out what&#8217;s best for us <img src='http://www.zoliblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10427</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10427</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Phil.  Or perhaps mark a selection (manual, or up the point where I am from top) as read.

Another problem I noticed with reading in a single sitting is that while I am scanning the long list and get into the detail of some, Reader updates itself, gets new items ABOVE where I am in the list, and there&#039;s no way to tell where the new ones are.  Either I lose my &#039;work&#039; of picking from the list, or lose the new entry:-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Phil.  Or perhaps mark a selection (manual, or up the point where I am from top) as read.</p>
<p>Another problem I noticed with reading in a single sitting is that while I am scanning the long list and get into the detail of some, Reader updates itself, gets new items ABOVE where I am in the list, and there&#8217;s no way to tell where the new ones are.  Either I lose my &#8216;work&#8217; of picking from the list, or lose the new entry:-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wainewright</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10426</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wainewright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10426</guid>
		<description>Too right, this is by far GReader&#039;s biggest flaw.

In fact, the reason I only just saw this post is because I&#039;ve been catching up after a trip and the consequent large swathes of time when I simply can&#039;t use GReader. I  use List View exactly the way you describe, and this functionality gap is a huge frustration. 

What would be ideal would be the ability to toggle individual posts between read/unread status. &#039;Cos the other problem is that once you&#039;ve amassed 100 or more posts, you then have to schedule a single sitting to go through them all and then &#039;mark all as read&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too right, this is by far GReader&#8217;s biggest flaw.</p>
<p>In fact, the reason I only just saw this post is because I&#8217;ve been catching up after a trip and the consequent large swathes of time when I simply can&#8217;t use GReader. I  use List View exactly the way you describe, and this functionality gap is a huge frustration. </p>
<p>What would be ideal would be the ability to toggle individual posts between read/unread status. &#8216;Cos the other problem is that once you&#8217;ve amassed 100 or more posts, you then have to schedule a single sitting to go through them all and then &#8216;mark all as read&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dharmesh Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10051</link>
		<dc:creator>Dharmesh Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/02/26/google-reader-offline-smart-yet-dumb/#comment-10051</guid>
		<description>You are not the only one that finds this frustrating.  I&#039;m in your camp.

Particularly irritating given that it seems to be a relatively easy thing to do (once you&#039;ve already got offline access enabled).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not the only one that finds this frustrating.  I&#8217;m in your camp.</p>
<p>Particularly irritating given that it seems to be a relatively easy thing to do (once you&#8217;ve already got offline access enabled).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
