<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the HP &#8211; EDS Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/05/13/on-the-hp-eds-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/05/13/on-the-hp-eds-deal/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Urban</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/05/13/on-the-hp-eds-deal/#comment-11664</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/05/13/on-the-hp-eds-deal/#comment-11664</guid>
		<description>I think it would make a lot of sense for HP to buy EDS. They share a lot fo the same clients in their portfolios - for that reason alone, why would HP loosing the service end of that business to someone else scooping up EDS?

Peter
follow me @ twitter.com/peterurban</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would make a lot of sense for HP to buy EDS. They share a lot fo the same clients in their portfolios &#8211; for that reason alone, why would HP loosing the service end of that business to someone else scooping up EDS?</p>
<p>Peter<br />
follow me @ twitter.com/peterurban</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 234/238 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.zoliblog.com @ 2012-02-10 02:16:41 -->
