<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DocSyncer Dead. Too Bad.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Night Dreaming (by Sudar) &#187; DocSyncer is dead, can you trust your data with beta services</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/#comment-12431</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Dreaming (by Sudar) &#187; DocSyncer is dead, can you trust your data with beta services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/#comment-12431</guid>
		<description>[...] even bother to send an email to the users, so that they can be prepared. It seems that they have posted a message in their website, but the users will visit the website only when they have to recover [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even bother to send an email to the users, so that they can be prepared. It seems that they have posted a message in their website, but the users will visit the website only when they have to recover [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/#comment-12213</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/#comment-12213</guid>
		<description>It was too bad it went down like that, right after they launched the &quot;Pro&quot; version.  I was hoping it would be &lt;em&gt;a cool tool that got acquired by a business&lt;/em&gt;, or at least &lt;em&gt;a cool tool that became obsolete because Google began offering file sync as standard fare with Google Docs&lt;/em&gt; so that we could still enjoy the syncing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was too bad it went down like that, right after they launched the &#8220;Pro&#8221; version.  I was hoping it would be <em>a cool tool that got acquired by a business</em>, or at least <em>a cool tool that became obsolete because Google began offering file sync as standard fare with Google Docs</em> so that we could still enjoy the syncing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIP: DocSyncer Closes Shop No More Google Docs Synchronization</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/#comment-12204</link>
		<dc:creator>RIP: DocSyncer Closes Shop No More Google Docs Synchronization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/06/16/docsyncer-dead-too-bad/#comment-12204</guid>
		<description>[...] Image Credit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Image Credit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
