<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Management 2.0 &#8211; What&#8217;s Wrong With 1.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:19:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PM 2.0 for IBM Lotus</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18868</link>
		<dc:creator>PM 2.0 for IBM Lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18868</guid>
		<description>What about Enterprise PM 2.0? One of the major issues for Enterprise customers is that all these visionary leaders are building their own proprietary collaboration space while the Enterprise collaboration space is currently dominated by Microsoft and IBM Lotus. Does this mean that Enterprise customers need to step outside their collaboration space to use PM 2.0?
Fortunately, no. We&#039;re seeing PM 2.0 solutions for both Microsoft (from Microsoft + business partners) and IBM Lotus (from an IBM Lotus business partner, Trilog Group, http://www.triloggroup.com).

With 160+ self-proclaimed PM 2.0 apps, its easy to forget the dominant players in the Enterprise collaboration space, namely because PM 2.0 is implemented an extension, not a replacement of the collaboration space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Enterprise PM 2.0? One of the major issues for Enterprise customers is that all these visionary leaders are building their own proprietary collaboration space while the Enterprise collaboration space is currently dominated by Microsoft and IBM Lotus. Does this mean that Enterprise customers need to step outside their collaboration space to use PM 2.0?<br />
Fortunately, no. We&#8217;re seeing PM 2.0 solutions for both Microsoft (from Microsoft + business partners) and IBM Lotus (from an IBM Lotus business partner, Trilog Group, <a href="http://www.triloggroup.com)" rel="nofollow">http://www.triloggroup.com)</a>.</p>
<p>With 160+ self-proclaimed PM 2.0 apps, its easy to forget the dominant players in the Enterprise collaboration space, namely because PM 2.0 is implemented an extension, not a replacement of the collaboration space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prince2 training</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18602</link>
		<dc:creator>Prince2 training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18602</guid>
		<description>I think good software that shares information is really important in good project management. You need clear communication policies as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think good software that shares information is really important in good project management. You need clear communication policies as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Management Templates</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18521</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Management Templates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18521</guid>
		<description>I don’t really know what the consensus definition of PM 2.0 is, but I do have a feeling based on my very 1.0-style experience</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t really know what the consensus definition of PM 2.0 is, but I do have a feeling based on my very 1.0-style experience</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gagandeep Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18466</link>
		<dc:creator>Gagandeep Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-18466</guid>
		<description>I feel PM 2.0 is evolving in pretty good shape and various interesting posts about it especially by Andrew Filev and Zoli give a good insight into the ideas. But it is a fact that it needs to become a standard and there needs to be a structure to the concept so that it can be formalized. Some sort of guidelines(like PMI has for the PM 1.0 - infact also applicable to PM 2.0) or simply some extension to the PM 1.0 guidelines especially in the execution and communication methodologies is the key here. It must finally find its way either in the PMI or the PRINCE2 add ons or say extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel PM 2.0 is evolving in pretty good shape and various interesting posts about it especially by Andrew Filev and Zoli give a good insight into the ideas. But it is a fact that it needs to become a standard and there needs to be a structure to the concept so that it can be formalized. Some sort of guidelines(like PMI has for the PM 1.0 &#8211; infact also applicable to PM 2.0) or simply some extension to the PM 1.0 guidelines especially in the execution and communication methodologies is the key here. It must finally find its way either in the PMI or the PRINCE2 add ons or say extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Daly: Great Websites for Project Managers &#124; Aligning Technology, Strategy, People &#38; Projects</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-14347</link>
		<dc:creator>David Daly: Great Websites for Project Managers &#124; Aligning Technology, Strategy, People &#38; Projects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-14347</guid>
		<description>[...] Project Management 2.0 - What&#8217;s Wrong With 1.0? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Project Management 2.0 &#8211; What&#8217;s Wrong With 1.0? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13775</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13775</guid>
		<description>I definitely think that the whole point of PM 2.0 is collaboration and sharing information. It&#039;s related to Web 2.0 right? Social networking and online project management tools. It has already changed the way we conduct business!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think that the whole point of PM 2.0 is collaboration and sharing information. It&#8217;s related to Web 2.0 right? Social networking and online project management tools. It has already changed the way we conduct business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Filev</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13580</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Filev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13580</guid>
		<description>Hi Zoli and readers,

That&#039;s a great intro into the panel. I look forward to it.

For those readers of Zoli&#039;s blog, who won&#039;t be able to visit our panel here&#039;s my humble definition of the term: http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/01/15/2008/Definition-of-Project-Management-2-0
You can also find there a lot of content on various aspects of the trend.

See you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zoli and readers,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great intro into the panel. I look forward to it.</p>
<p>For those readers of Zoli&#8217;s blog, who won&#8217;t be able to visit our panel here&#8217;s my humble definition of the term: <a href="http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/01/15/2008/Definition-of-Project-Management-2-0" rel="nofollow">http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/01/15/2008/Definition-of-Project-Management-2-0</a><br />
You can also find there a lot of content on various aspects of the trend.</p>
<p>See you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is anyone ever really truly fully right? &#124; RedFlameOut's Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13539</link>
		<dc:creator>Is anyone ever really truly fully right? &#124; RedFlameOut's Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13539</guid>
		<description>[...] Project Management 2.0 - What&#8217;s Wrong With 1.0? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Project Management 2.0 &#8211; What&#8217;s Wrong With 1.0? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13530</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13530</guid>
		<description>Well i think that PM 1.0 was all about planning, reporting and it served Management but did not help actual Project Execution. And My expectation of PM 2.0 is that They all basically agree that it’s about using online collaboration tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i think that PM 1.0 was all about planning, reporting and it served Management but did not help actual Project Execution. And My expectation of PM 2.0 is that They all basically agree that it’s about using online collaboration tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce P. Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13529</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce P. Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoliblog.com/2008/08/28/project-management-20-whats-wrong-with-10/#comment-13529</guid>
		<description>Zoli, I am looking forward to meeting you at the Office 2.0 conference.

I think the question of what was wrong with PM 1.0 and how does PM 2.0 attempt to address those things is going to generate a fantastic discussion! I&#039;m SO looking forward to it.

Slightly more detail in my post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liquidplanner.com/blog/2008/08/28/project-management-20-office-20-in-sfo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Project Management 2.0 @ Office 2.0&lt;/a&gt;

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoli, I am looking forward to meeting you at the Office 2.0 conference.</p>
<p>I think the question of what was wrong with PM 1.0 and how does PM 2.0 attempt to address those things is going to generate a fantastic discussion! I&#8217;m SO looking forward to it.</p>
<p>Slightly more detail in my post about <a href="http://www.liquidplanner.com/blog/2008/08/28/project-management-20-office-20-in-sfo" rel="nofollow">Project Management 2.0 @ Office 2.0</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
