Brick-and-Mortar Stores Need Uninformed Customers

Business, Technology July 19th, 2008

$49.99

$5.36

I moved my printer and need a longer USB cable.  Options:

- Drive to Best Buy, hoping they have the 15ft cable in store.  Cost: $49.99 + gas + an hour of my time.

- Order on eBay. Cost: $5.36, shipping included + 5 minutes research and order.

Oh, yes, I am not getting the gold-plated version.  Who needs it anyway?

Brick-and-mortar stores really need uniformed customers to survive.

Update: To Save Gas, Shoppers Stay Home and Click - reports The New York Times.

Tags: , , , , ,

iPhone Battery Power: Worthless Comparisons.

Technology July 14th, 2008

PC World, Gizmodo, 9 to 5 Mac, Mobility Site , jkOnTheRun and probably a bunch of others happily report that while the iPhone 3g battery life can’t be compared to the first-gen one, it’s still better than any other 3G phones on the market today.

This is a worthless comparison without adding the important fact that other phones have replaceable batteries.  C’mon, spare batteries are so slim, you can easily carry one, and use your phone without any interruption  - except on the iPhone: when it’s gone, in about 5 hours, you’re dead.

Zemanta Pixie

Tags: , , , , ,

OMG the First Good Windows Product Soon Dead

Technology July 9th, 2008

WindowsNow reports that Windows 3.11 has officially reached its end-of-life. Wow!  Obviously obsolete as a standalone product, it is still being sold in embedded systems - until November 1st, 2008. Who would have thought?

I actually liked that OS… in fact I also liked DOS 3.1 - even though I had the PC-DOS version on my system, cause where I worked back then, people believed they would soon squash this nasty little company putting out the MS-DOS version. smile_yawn

Tags: , , , , , , ,

ScanCafe Can Save Your Old Photos Before It’s Too Late

Misc, Technology July 7th, 2008

If you’re a younger member of Generation Y,  chances are the first camera you held in your hand was digital… but everybody else, please stop and think for a minute: when was the last time you checked your old photos printed on Kodak, Fuji, Agfa,  you-name-it paper a long time ago?   It’s nice to have them in an album, collecting dust.  Well, they do something else: they fade.

This formerly black-and-white photo of yours truly turned brownish, but that may just be acceptable over 4 decades… but I was shocked to see some of my student-back-packer-trip color prints turn in the same shade, even though they were only 20 or so years old. (Must have picked a cheap lab back then).

I’ve long been thinking of digitizing them, but all my flare-ups ended with the quick realization that scanning in thousands of photos - prints, negatives and slides - would take me years, and even then the result would be of questionable quality.  So I was really happy to read raving reviews of ScanCafe, a two-year old service, that takes care of it all at reasonable prices.

Anyone can buy a bunch of scanners and start a digitizing business, but ScanCafe brought a twist to the process: they perform all processing in India, (their own employees and facility, not outsourced), which allows them to be the price-leader, yet add a level of human post-processing that ensures the best quality.

You initiate the ordering process online, where you get abundant information on the process, packaging requirements..etc, then, after paying half the estimated price you print a UPS label.

Your package first goes to ScanCafe HQ in California, where it’s examined, re-packaged and shipped off to India. You can track progress every step of the way.  A few weeks later you can review the low-res scans online.  Here comes the good part: you can discard up to 50% of what they already scanned in. This is a life - OK, just budget - saver, when you consider how difficult it is to pick good pictures especially from negatives. Chances are you - like me- won’t bother, just throw the whole bundle in an envelope, and would waste a lot of money paying for all of them.

Next you wait… and wait.   Another few weeks later you receive a package with your hi-res pix on DVD and all your originals back.  This was when I got the real surprise: I was hoping for good quality, but was amazed at just how good it really is.  Prints are scanned at 3000 dpi,  negatives at 600 dpi, unless you pay for pro level,  Kodak Digital ICE™  is used for scratch removal, color correction is applied ..etc…etc,  but I suspect what really makes the difference is the 2-3 minutes of pro-level touch-up processing they perform on every image.  The results: great looking photos, I’d even risk saying several images they scanned from negative beat the quality of the average photo I take with my digital camera nowadays.

So, as far as quality is concerned, I am extremely happy - happy, despite the fact that there was a glitch with my first order.  One of two DVD’s had a read problem, they had to send me a replacement.  That was a bummer, but they were courteous, and at least I got to know Customer Service.

After my first 1,400 pix, another 2000 or so are now on their way to ScanCafe.  About the only reason to complain may be the slowness of the process: when the service started, they claimed 4-5 weeks, then 8, and in reality turnaround is 8-10 weeks.  Very, very slow, but does it really matter?  We’re talking about salvaging photos that have been sitting on some shelf for decades, what difference do 2-3 months make?

In return for your patience you get the lowest prices on the market, in fact less than half the industry average - see this Money Magazine article for comparison.

Color negatives 19c
Slides 24c
Prints 27c

That’s just the basics, of course there are a number of add-on scanning and restoration services.

If pricing was the good news, it’s now becoming somewhat of a bad news, too: having been successful for almost two years ScanCafe is about to increase prices. Starting July 14th negatives will go from 19c to 24c, slides from 24c to 29c - still a bargain, but for someone like me with thousands of scans it makes a difference.   Oh, and they pull a somewhat questionable marketing trick: what used to be standard pricing is now re-dressed as Spring Promotion, and the price-hike disguised as the end of the promotion.  No need to have done it guys, you’re still the price leader, why not be straight about the hike?

That said, I found ScanCafe a great deal, and I’m glad my old photos no longer just collect dust.  In fact I like the service so much, that I signed up for their affiliate program, so if you order through this badge below, I’ll receive a commission.

Remember, you have a week left before the price increase.   But wait, here’s a price-saving tip (Gee, I feel like a Sunday morning TV infomercialsmile_wink).   There are two discount codes floating around the Web:  SMUG20 and SMUG15.  When I tried them, SMUG20 no longer worked, but SMUG15 was still valid, giving you 15% off at the time of checkout.

Update: With perfect timing, by Larry Dignan @ ZDNet: Study: Offshore outsourcing dings customer satisfaction; Taking back office offshore ok.

ScanCafe’s competitors were labeling their India-based processing risky.   First of all, what ScanCafe does is not outsourcing, they are operating their own Imaging Center in Bangalore, right next to GE and SAP, amongst others.

Second, what they perform there is classic “back office”, non-customer-facing operations.  When I needed Customer Service (see above), all my interactions were with the Burlingame, CA based stuff.   Just like the Study says.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Basic Tab, Inspired by iPhone

Technology July 6th, 2008

While people are already waiting in line for the 3G iPhone, here’s another iPhone-inspired concept phone, for the design conscious: the Basic Tab.

Tags: , ,

Craving for a Readius

Technology July 6th, 2008

I want it.

eBook reader with a flex-screen.  Details at The New York Times.

Tags: , , , ,

LinkednIn Down in Celebration of their Billion-Dollar Club Membership

Software, Startups, Technology June 18th, 2008

<rant>

Quite a celebration: just the day after their $53M investment round, valuing the company at $1B (that’s Billion with a B) was announced, LinkedIn is down:

Is there a new emerging trend here?   PR blitz, big announcement, site is dead.  Other examples just this week:

Firefox Download Day leads to dead site.

Technorati Monster shows to celebrate investment + new ad network.  ( But hey, new Sales Team here to help, instead of technologists)

Then there was twitter .. then .. then ….smile_angry

</rant>

Zemanta Pixie

Tags: , , , ,

Microsoft’s Echoes Does NOT Eliminate Phone Numbers

Personal Productivity, Technology May 30th, 2008

Grand title for a grand plan: Mary Jo Foley reports about Microsoft’s grand plan to eliminate phone numbers .

The problem is, it really does not eliminate phone numbers, just makes them more convenient for use. It’s not Mary Jo’s fault, she just quotes Bill Gates:

“Right now the mobile phone, the desktop phone, the e-mail that you have on the PC, or instant messaging, these are all very different things, and the issues about how much of your information or your schedule, your current activity you share with people who communicate with you is not well designed…. By bringing together all of these kinds of communication, we can greatly simplify them. We can get rid of phone numbers, have it so when you say you want to contact someone, based on who you are and where that person is, they can decide whether to take the call or take a message about that, and so a great efficiency improvement that can be made there.”

Microsoft’s new Echoes service platform will indeed assign a mobile number to Windows Live contacts, and synchronize everything with everythingsmile_wink allowing communication via voice call, email, SMS.. you name it.

Nice. But let’s think for a minute.

When I grew up we had rotary phones, I probably knew a few dozen phone numbers by heart, since every time I called a friend I had to manually dial it. For the rest, there was the big thick phone book.

Along came the first push-button phones and we could program a few numbers into speed-dial. The issue was no longer knowing all he phone numbers, but remembering which button was which.

Don’t worry, I am not about to walk through all the technology improvements in such detail, as most of my readers remember the rest. Phones with more memory, LCD screens, directories, cell-phones, PDA’s, PC-based programs..etc all have one thing in common: they still use phone numbers, we just don’t have to remember them. Heck, I don’t know all my own phone numbers (but GrandCentral doessmile_regular)

These devices did not eliminate phone numbers; they just made it more convenient to use them. Just like Microsoft’s Echoes (supposedly) will.

All that said, convenience is important, so Echoes is a great plan if and when it works and gets universal acceptance. Of course the flip-side is it’s reliance on Windows Live. Anyone smells lock-in? Let’s not forget for many people Windows Live log-in is their former Microsoft Passport login. The infamous Passport that went down so often depriving users access to basic services, including their own finances. The Passport that Microsoft handles a bit too casually. Here’s a little anecdote just to make the point:

A few months ago I wanted to try Microsoft’s Health Vault ( a system so over-complicated that I can almost guarantee patients won’t be able to use it) and it required my Live (formerly Passport) login. Then it told me my password was not secure enough and forced me to change it. I thought I was changing my vault access only, there was no warning whatsoever that this would change my login to all other systems requiring Live login. I only found out when I could not log in to Microsoft Money, where I manage all my finances.

Conclusion: Echoes sounds like a good, useful plan, just beware what it means to be locked in to a Microsoft platform.

Zemanta Pixie

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Apple Sneaky, Microsoft is No Angel, Either

Customer Service, Software, Technology March 25th, 2008

I’ve been observing an annoying trend on TechMeme for a while now: when a good discussion happens over the weekend, obviously some writers will miss it - then they sleep on it, come back to it a few days later and TechMeme picks it up as a new theme.

That’s what we’re seeing today with ZDNet blogger Ed Bott coming back to the Apple Update brouhaha and trying to place Microsoft on a morel higher ground.

In summary, the issue was that the Apple iTunes update program all of a sudden wanted to install the Safari browser on Windows PC’s and had it as the preselected default. That’s certified bad behavior. Even worse is the fact that it’s not new at all - a fact missed by almost all but yours truly. I pointed out that:

  • the same update program has been trying to install iTunes on a Windows machine where I don’t have it, don’t need it forever, despite unselecting it every single time
  • the update runs because I do have Quicktime installed, and Quicktime itself is as aggressive as it gets, re-installing itself in the XP systray no matter how many times you remove it.

To me this was all about respecting users choice or not. But the discussion went the “wrong way”:

  • Apple fans are a religious cult who came in hordes to defend Holy Apple. (before you chastise me, just look at how often I point to Apple as a better choice, without becoming blindly faithful)
  • Most debate focused on whether Firefox or Safari is the better browser (IE dully ignored) - nice tactics to change the subject…

And now here comes Ed Bott with a provocative title: What Microsoft can teach Apple about software updates:

For the record, I think Apple is dead wrong in the way it’s gone about using its iPod monopoly to expand its share in another market.

Right.

Ironically, an excellent model for how this update program should work already exists. It’s called Windows Update, and it embodies all the principles that Apple should follow.

Dead wrong.

I can’t believe anyone in their right mind would quote Windows Update, known for delivering patches that mess up one’s system only to be patched again and again as the ideal model to follow. One does not have to go too far, just look at the reports on systems disabled by the recent Vista SP1 update. The worlds richest company could not put a decent operating system together in five years, and a full year later the best they can deliver is a botched update!

But since Ed takes the opportunity to place Microsoft on the moral high ground in general, let’s not forget about another recent Microsoft update coup:

The windows live installer, released last September while offered an opt-out screen like Apple does now, then proceeded to install Windows Desktop Search, without ever asking for permission or even notifying the user.

Not only this was outrageously bad practice, completely ignoring the users right to decide what they want on their computers, it was also performance degrading, especially on systems that already had another desktop search installed (see system bar above).

So back to Ed Bott: yes, I condemn Apple’s latest move, but please, please, never in a million years would I think of setting Microsoft as the model to follow.

 

Update:  This window just popped up on my system:

Windows Firewall blocked Foldershare - a Microsoft product, which just got updated a few days ago. Only (?) problem is, I have (I should have) Windows Firewall turned off, since McAfee is installed, too.  WTF is this message?  Or has Win Firewall been turned on by some update, without asking me?   And why is it my job to investigate?

 

Related posts: Inner Exception, Tom Raftery’s Social Media and ParisLemon

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Web Applications on the Desktop

Personal Productivity, SaaS, Technology March 22nd, 2008

The latest trend in Web Applications is - surprise, surprise! - going back on to the desktop. e Adobe Air and Mozilla Prism are two technologies that help Web Apps behave more .. hm, surprise, surprise! … desktop-like. Full circle? Why the “move to the cloud” circus if we’re coming back to the desktop anyway?

Well, we’re not. We’re just doing web apps differently. Matthew Gertner, former CTO of Allpeers (in the deadpool) who is currently working on Prism provides his perspective on TechCrunch. I can’t even attempt to add to the technical discussion, so I’ll play the dumb business user (won’t be too difficult smile_sarcastic) and explain what I see from that angle.

First of all, there appears to be some confusion in this dialogue: Google Gears and Single Site Browsers (SSBs) are two different animals, even if Gears has future extension plans.

  • Gears is all about offline access, which, let’s face it, make sense, until we have “always-on, everywhere” connectivity. It’s data access, and it’s good, albeit somewhat cludgy.
  • SSB’s are all about convenience: instead of just having tabs in the browser, certain applications now have their own window, can be minimized, when closed can show up in the systray ..etc - in other words they behave like desktop applications. When the everything-in-a-browser concept became popular we all worked on 15-17″ displays. Today huge displays are affordable and popular - but now that I have all this screen real-estate, I’d like to be able to display 3-4 windows at a time - not flip-flopping between, but have them all available. I can’t do that with the browser tabs, unless I launch multiple browsers ( waste of resources) or find the way to detach some tabs - that’s what SSB’s do.

A commenter on TechCrunch asks:

So it is progress to send things back to being one window with no tabs?
Wasn’t the point of tabs to put all of those windows into one?

No. The point was not having to install myriad applications that need to be patched, the data files scanned for viruses ..etc. Now, I consider myself progressive, and like to support the future trend just out of principle, but I am first of all a user, and nothing convinces a user better then their own pain. So here are a few examples of my own pain with desktop computing, just from the last two days.

  • I turned on an older laptop I don’t often use nowadays, and I literally had no access to it, the damn thing kept itself busy for an hour with Windows Update, McAfee update, (I killed the virus can), Foldershare sync and Copernic desktop search indexing. In other words, it was struggling just to stay up-to-date, and I could only get to use it an hours or so later.
  • The very reason I turned it on is that even though I now have a screamer desktop, I have to fall back on the slow laptops any time I need to edit a PDF file: my trusted old Adobe Acrobat 6 is not supported on Vista, and I am not about to cough up the price when I don’t need new functionality, so I have to keep the old junk running, just to avoid losing functionality I paid for. I won’t have to do this forever, some of the Web-based Acrobat alternatives are getting pretty good…
  • I’m in the middle of a major paper elimination project: throwing away boxes of expired folders, keeping only electronic copies of the crucial stuff. This involved hours of installing and uninstalling obsolete software this afternoon: Turbotax versions all the way from 1996 only so I can read the .tax file once and convert it to PDF. Intuit now offers Turbotax entirely online, and while I haven’t found any info on how long they support retrieval of old returns, as the years go by I’m sure they will address it - and I don’t have to install anything.
  • A few hours later the old PC started to choke: it ran out of hardware space. Impossible! Just a few months ago I removed all my photos, that’s a huge gain, I should have ample space. Yeah, right, it turns out Foldershare, which I use to keep the 3 household computers in sync accumulated over 10G in its trash folders, which is nothing on the new PC, but a third of the old laptop’s 30Mb storage capacity. And would you believe there’s no setup option to auto-clear trash from time to time? (It can auto-delete your real files, just not trash.)

Personal computers, and the desktop computing model were liberating in the 80’s, when they got us off the dumb green terminals, which we could only access at work, that is those of use who worked at large corporations who could afford a mainframe. PC’s were expensive enough that any one of us only owned one, if any, and the ability to work on that single machine actually meant increased access and mobility. But as we upgrade, we tend to keep the older computers, and I bet most of my readers have more than one computer in their household, let alone business.

Keeping all of them up-to-date, having the same Application versions on all, synchronizing data is becoming more and more of a pain. Just as computing shifted to the Client model in the late 80’s, we’re facing another shift now, and the move off the desktop, on to the Cloud will be just as liberating as getting onto it was 20 years ago. Access to applications and data will no longer will be tied to a particular piece of hardware and we don’t worry about updates, maintenance - offload it to the Service Provider.

In other words Software as a Service is increasingly all about the second “S”.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,