Conspiracy Theory: the Vista-ization of Windows 7 has Started…
Personal Productivity, Software May 4th, 2011
I simply don’t get it: Vista is barely out, nobody seems to like it, CIO’s refuse to upgrade, analyst firms tell them to wait, individual users who tried it switch back to XP, others time their new PC purchase so they can still get an XP machine – generally speaking Vista was as poorly received as the ill-fated Windows ME.
Apple is gaining market share, the major computer manufacturers are offering Linux PC’s, the Web OS concept is getting popular, applications are already on the Web – can anyone clearly see the shape of personal computing in 2012? (Yes, I know MS plans for 2010, I’m just adding the customary delay.) Will it still matter what OS we use to get on the Internet? How can Microsoft be so out of touch?
I was right and I was wrong. Right in the assessment, that Vista’s main competitor was Microsoft’s own solid OS, WinXP – there was simply no reason to upgrade. Yet as buying new computers with Good Ole Vista became increasingly difficult, many of us got stuck with Vista. I was wrong in not foreseeing that Vista would turn out to be such a disaster, that millions of Vista victims would end up paying the ransom to get out of the trap and get the version of the OS that actually works: Windows 7.
What followed was two peaceful years when Windows computers simply worked. Yes, They Just Worked. Almost like a Mac. ![]()
Then the unexpected (?) happened…
Tags: CloudAve, Just for fun, microsoft, rant, vista, win7, Windows, windows 7, windows upgrade, xp
HP Slate 500–Big Yawn.
Technology October 22nd, 2010
I love my iPad. I hate my iPad. Was preparing to dump it for the Samsung Galaxy Tab, until it turned out to be a 7”-er now. Size matters, after all (or is it just my eyes?).
So I got momentarily excited reading about the HP Slate 500 but that was a short moment. The new business-focused device is based on Windows 7. Now, as a former victim of Vista I’ll be the first one to admit that Windows 7 is a stable, good operating system. For the PC. It’s just not meant for a tablet. Even if you call it a slate. The proof comes at the 27th second of this engadget video (the best part of which is the leading commercial. The kids are cute
)
Yes, you have to touch items from …
Tags: CloudAve, hp slate, IPad, samsung galaxy, tablet, tablets, Windows
Apple is Just as Sneaky as Microsoft, Dumping Software on Your Computer
Software September 27th, 2009
Here we go again: Ed Bott points out how outrageous it is for Apple to install so-called “updates” to the iPhone Configuration Utility on a Windows computer that does not have this software installed, in fact one that has never had an iPhone or iPod connected to.
He is right, this is obviously not an update, but installing new, and in his case obviously unnecessarily software. It’s also not the first time, I wrote about a similar experience early last year:
- the same update program has been trying to install iTunes on a Windows machine where I don’t have it, don’t need it forever, despite unselecting it every single time
- the update runs because I do have Quicktime installed, and Quicktime itself is as aggressive as it gets, re-installing itself in the XP systray no matter how many times you remove it.
Back then I also wrote:
Apple fans are a religious cult who came in hordes to defend Holy Apple. (before you chastise me, just look at how often I point to Apple as a better choice, without becoming blindly faithful)
And boy, did I prove right on that .. Ed Bott barely finished his post, when the first Apple-defender appeared, accusing him of being just a bit to picky when it comes to Apple:
I’m sorry Ed but I think you’re getting a little carried away here. I have no problem with any software maker – operating system or otherwise – letting me know that updates are available.
Wow.. really? How about getting dozens (hundreds?) of software update proposals a day? there must be hudreds of thousands of software title out there, why not recommend all? Steven Hodson appears to have given his consent:
How is the utility suppose to get your consent if it doesn’t run in the first place. Perhaps the problem here is really one of wording. Would it make a difference Ed if it was called “Software Notification Service”?
No, it would not make a difference. An update is an update. To software already installed on my computer by choice. My choice, not some manufacturer’s. Anything else is unethical intrusion.
And before the Apple-camp declares was on me: I am not exactly a Microsoft-fanboy, in fact I will admit an anti-Microsoft bias for all the lost productivity due to their half-done software. The very un-scientific method of talking to friends suggests Apple owners are more satisfied with their computers, gadgets, software and the company as a whole. Here’s a telling quote from CrunchGear:
Apple could require you to give this device three drops of blood every morning in order to satisfy the demonic hell-beast soul trapped inside it and we would, gladly.
Wow. Well, give your blood if you like, but don’t be blind: abuse is abuse, no matter whether it comes from Redmond or Cupertino.
Related posts:
- Apple shovelware problems again (iPhone Configuration Utility 2.1)
- Unwantedware from Apple
- Apple Sneaky, Microsoft is No Angel, Either
- Take Your Paws Off My System, Microsoft

Tags: Apple, CloudAve, iPhone, iTunes, microsoft, smartphones, Windows
Vista Update Drives PC Into Perpetual Reboot Cycle
Personal Productivity September 8th, 2009
My Vista-based laptop gave me the Windows has recovered from an unexpected shutdown screen: this is where you have the options to start Windows normally or select one of several “safe” driver- and service-less modes to boot. I picked normal, the system booted .. end of story.
Except… I walked away for a little while, and 15 or so minutes later when I came back, the computer was in the same stage. So I repeated the process… and guess what:
Coming back a little later again, I saw the computer at the ugly reboot screen again. What was going on? This is a few weeks old laptop with hardly anything installed on it, is it already dying?
I got lucky: for the first time in my life, Vista’s Problem Reports and Solutions actually found the answer:
After you apply update 973879 on a computer that is running an x64-based version of Windows Vista or of Windows Server 2008, you may receive a "Stop 0x0000007e" or "Stop 0×00000050" error message within 10 minutes after system startup.
Well, not exactly, I dug into what these errors were, and my computer behaved rather differently, basically playing a game of perpetual reboot. Still, I figured I would go ahead and uninstall this update – I even got lucky, I could simply remove it without having to resort to the more torturous Method 3, that involves a Windows Preinstallation Environment. (Yuck… I don’t like the sound of it.).
Voila! My PC is in working condition again… and I just hope in won’t become total crap in the two months left before it gets rescued by Windows 7.
(Cross-posted @ CloudAve)
Tags: CloudAve, vista, vistasucks, Windows, windows 7, windows update, windows vista
Just My Usual PC Rant…
Software May 5th, 2009
<rant>
My shiny new Dell Mini 12 on startup from hibernation:
“Resuming Windows” – how long do you think it should take? 30 seconds? A few minutes?
Forever. That’s all it does. Stuck. Forced shut-off, start again.
Now it’s “Checking for updates to Adobe Updater”. No kidding. 6-7 minutes later Adobe Acrobat Reader 9 is updated. But now McAfee is updating itself.
No wonder I hate desktop software.
</rant>
Tags: adobe, dell mini, desktop software, hibernation, netbook, pc, sofware updates, Windows, windowssucks
My Miracle PC
Personal Productivity, Software February 19th, 2009
It does so much, while using zero resources:
Of course that’s not the typical picture, more often than not CPU usage is in the upper 80-90% range, while the Resource Monitor can only account for about 40%. Just another crappy program from Microsoft… but no worries: Windows 7: Cutting corners in the rush to market? How reassuring…
Tags: microsoft, resource monitor, vista, vistasucks, Windows, windows 7
Netbooks or Notebooks? It’s Not Only About Size.
Technology November 3rd, 2008
Hardly a day goes by without another new Netbook announcement, at lower and lower prices. The first baby eee PC by ASUS was toy-like ( I returned it after a day), but the current crop are quite usable mobile computing devices.
These new Netbooks are flying off the shelf, so much so that sometimes you wonder if manufacturers rush to re-label their notebooks to netbooks, just to ride the wave. Whereas the first model had a puny 7” screen, the current standard is a minimum of 8.9, but 10” is becoming widely available, and when Dell recently announced their Inspiron Mini 12, ZDNet’s Larry Dignan rightfully noted that the netbook-notebook-laptop lines have just become blurry.
Dell’s divider line may very well be at the 12” screen size, considering anything beyond that a notebook. ASUS CEO Jerry Shen clearly draws the line at 10” – a definition that fits his own eee PC line. I think all these size-based definitions are meaningless. Size truly matters, but for another reason: when you pick a travel n*tbook, you clearly need something small and lightweight, yet with a decent keyboard and screen. But that’s not what differentiates Netbooks from any other computer.
The real divider is how you use it. A Netbook is a light mobile computing device that allows you to process information, access the Internet, and that does not store a bundle of bloated programs or data.
When computers first became personal, most of us only got one at the workplace, then years later the family PC appeared– one expensive computer shared by the entire family. Now we often have individual PC’s for just about anyone at home, including the kids, and are moving to a new pattern, where individuals will have a number of purpose-oriented computing devices, be it a desktop, workhorse laptop, netbook or smartphone. The fundamental change is that we’re not really working on the computer itself, but on the Net: the computer (keyboard, screen) is just our way to access the net. As Coding Horror’s Jeff Atwood says in The Web Browser is the New Laptop :
After spending some time with a netbook, I realized that calling them "small laptops" is a mistake. Netbooks are an entirely different breed of animal. They are cheap, portable web browsers.
We’re getting to the point where for most productivity task the computer’s performance or even the operating system won’t matter anymore: all we need is a decent screen and keyboard to get online.
But computer manufacturers while jumping on this hot new trend, seem to be confused. Minor flavors aside they typically offer two major configurations:
- The uber-geek netbook:
- Linux
- Solid-state drive (SSD)
- For the rest of the world:
- Windows XP
- Traditional hard drive
That’s not a very smart combination, if you ask me. Statistics show the return rate of Linux vs. Windows based netbooks is 4 to 1. Buyers of the cute little netbooks are happy first, then they become frustrated that they can’t instantly do things they are used to – and a learning curve with a $400 $200 device is unacceptable. Let’s face it, Linux is not friendly enough for most non-geeks – including yours truly. But why can I not have a netbook with XP and SSD?
Typical netbook SSD’s are still in the 8-16GB range, while harddisks are up to 160GB. That’s a trap that vendor themselves fall into: my sexy little netbook (an Acer Aspire One) came loaded with crapware, including trial versions of MS Office, MS Works, Intervideo WinDVD (on a DVD-less computer!) and who knows what else. Once the pattern is established, and you have large storage, you will start installing your own programs and data, too, the temptation is just too hard to resist. You no longer have a netbook, it just became a noteboook.
The New York Times ran an article this week: In Age of Impatience, Cutting Computer Start Time, discussing the problem of slow boot times. Anyone who ever had a Windows computer knows this tends to get worse over time. My own Vista desktop had a sub-minute startup time a year ago when new, not it takes 3-4 minute to boot it. The two older XP-based laptops take 6-7 minutes to reboot. This well-known Windows disease can only be cured by refreshing your system from time to time. It’s an ugly process, requires wiping out your harddisk’s content, re-installing Windows, then your programs and data. PC manufacturers don’t exactly help by providing “restore disks” instead of proper OS CD’s: why would you start with a pre- SP1 copy of WinXP and reinstall a bunch of years-old obsolete crapware when the objective was to cleanup your system in the first place?
If you want to avoid the pain, keep your netbook free of applications and data: use it as a NETbook, and it will stay nimble and fast (sort of).
Talk about fast, there’s a neat solution to reduce boot-up time: Splashtop, a quick-load platform by startup company DeviceVM can put you online within seconds, without loading the main operating system. Chances are you’d be using it 80% of the time, relegating full Windows to an as-needed basis. DeviceVM charges manufacturers about $1 per system, so why is it that it’s often found in high-end notebooks, but not in the netbooks by the same manufacturer? Splashtop should be a must on any netbook.
Finally, a word on connectivity and prices: Wifi gets you online almost, but not all the time, so obviously a 3G connection is a useful addition to your netbook. But you will pay for 3G data usage, so why don’t carriers subsidize your netbook purchase, like they do with cell phones? The day will come, as the WSJ reports, HP may be one of the first to introduce such a model: H-P Mulls Service Bundles for Netbooks. When that happens, your notebook will not be too different from a smartphone, just with a larger keyboard and display.
(Cross-posted from CloudAve.)
Related articles by Zemanta
- Spashtop joins Lenovo to unveil Instant-On Netbook
- Lightweight Windows 7 pre-Beta on Eee PC 1000H looks very promising
- Asustek expects to ship US$200 Eee PC in 2009, says president
- Asus expects $200 Eee PC Netbook in 2009
- Want a $200 Eee PC? You only have to wait till next year
- Linux to Ship on More Desktops than Windows
- Linux: Coming soon to a Windows laptop near you
- Why Netbooks Will Soon Cost $99
- Netbooks are just going to get better
Tags: acer, asus, bloatware, crapware, dell, devicevm, HP, lenovo, linux, mobility, netbooks, notebooks, online, splashtop, Web Applications, web office, Windows, winxp
Apple is gaining market share, the 

be called Vista SP3.
Zoli Erdos