post

On-demand CRM: Lunch is (Almost) Free

Will Microsoft eat Salesforce.com’s lunch with their freshly announced pricing for hosted CRM? There is a heated debate on the subject, with longtime enterprise software guru Josh Greenbaum declaring that Microsoft is about to eat Salesforce.com’s lunch:

“2008 promises to be the real year of on-demand CRM: It’s Salesforce.com’s market to lose, and, unless something changes dramatically in their favor, lose it they will.”

Josh has been bearish on Salesforce.com for a while, declaring it the next Siebel. It’s a bold call, but calling it ahead of the curve, based on fundamentals, going against the trend is what makes a real analyst.

Salesforce.com does not seem to be worried about their lunch-ticket though:

“What it looks like is that Microsoft is just marking down an inferior product to what customers are actually paying right now. “

says Bruce Francis, vice president of corporate strategy on Tod Bishop’s Blog. Ouch! He goes on:

“Also, one thing that I haven’t seen is the url where I can sign up for a 30-day trial.”

Well, I can point to such a URL, albeit not at Microsoft: http://zohocrm.com. (Disclaimer: I’m an advisor to Zoho)

I’ve long stated that Zoho’s product is actually more than just CRM: with Sales Order Management, Procurement, Inventory Management, Invoicing functionality Zoho seems to have the makings of a CRM+ERP solution, under the disguise of the CRM label. The company also stated they are working on Accounting and HR, they have a database/application Creator, and the best-in-class Office Suite: can you see the Big Picture?

Now, for the best part: pricing. Microsoft is heralded to undercut Salesforce.com with their $44/$59 per user pricing. That’s still a hefty price, if you ask me – Zoho CRM is free for the first 3 users, then $12 per user. I don’t know who is eating whose lunch, but if you are a business user, $12 bucks for CRM+++ is as close to a free lunch ticket as you can get.smile_regular

How can Zoho do this? They are passionate about the real meaning of the On-Demand revolution: bringing good quality yet affordable software as a service to the masses. They are an efficient development “machine” and manage to cut out “fat”: Sales expenses, traditionally representing 70-80% of costs in the enterprise software business. We have an ongoing debate in the Enterprise Irregulars on whether this inexpensive “pull” model is hype or reality. The nay-sayers point to Salesforce.com, or the new IPO-hopeful NetSuite: sales costs are sky high, and for all the “no software” revolution Marc Benioff has brought about, he employs a rather traditional enterprise sales staff, a’la Oracle. The key differentiator IMHO is the target market:

“Salesforce.com is focusing more of its efforts these days on capturing larger enterprise accounts”

-says Phil Wainewright, and that means traditional, expensive sales. Viral Marketing, demand generation, try-online-then-sign-up works better with the Small Business market, which is what Zoho is focusing on. The Street only seems to value the large corporate market, so it’s understandable that venture funded, IPO-driven or already public companies strive to move up the chain; Zoho is privately owned, and can afford to grow their business as they wish – apparently they see the goldmine waiting to be explored on the SMB market.

Related posts on TechMeme: eWEEK.com, Enterprise Anti-matter, Software as Services, Steve Clayton, Techdirt , CNET News.com, Microsoft News Tracker ,Zoho Blogs

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

post

Yahoo Completely Wiped Out

Has Yahoo ever existed?   I don’t see any trace of it… it’s all gone.  My.yahoo.com, the main yahoo pages … you name it, it’s all down.  

Until this morning I haven’t  realized just how dependent I’ve became on Yahoo, even though I hardly ever “actively” use it.  After seeing my.yahoo dead, I started to read blogs from TechMeme – wanted to save one to del.icio.us – yuck, it’s dead, too, since it’s now a Yahoo property.  Trying to load my blog takes forever – waiting for mybloglog to load – yet another Yahoo service.   How about Flickr?   Dead, too – it really looks like Yahoo is completely MIA.  smile_sad

 

post

NetSuite IPO Will Soon Cost Me …

… my  #2 position on Google. smile_embaressed.  It’s actually quite amazing: fellow Enterprise Irregular Jason Wood and I had a good dialogue about NetSuite’s long-expected IPO, and voila! Jason’s post is #1, mine is #2 on Google. 

 I suppose it won’t last long with the flurry of news… but it’s a good change.  NetSuite has a good product, I’m happy for them. clap

Related posts:  Business Week, Between the Lines, CNET News.com, HipMojo.com , Tech Trader Daily, Techdirt.

 

post

G-Combinator :-)

Google offers funding to gadget developers:

  1. Grants of $5,000 to those who’ve built gadgets they’d like to see developed further.
  2. Seed investments of $100,000 to developers who’d like to build a business around the Google gadgets platform.

(hat tip: TechCrunch)

Update (6/28): This is now on top of TechMeme: Web Strategy, Googling Google, paidContent.org, Niall Kennedy’s Weblog, Online Marketing Blog, ReadWriteWeb, mathewingram.com/work, Search Engine Land

Tags: , , , , , , ,

post

SVASE VC Breakfast with Ann Winblad of Hummer Winblad Venture Partners

After a long break I’ll be hosting another SVASE VC Breakfast Club meeting tomorrow, June 28th in San Francisco.  As usual, it’s an informal round-table where 10 entrepreneurs get to deliver a pitch, then answer questions and get critiqued by a VC Partner. We’ve had VC’s from Draper Fisher,  Kleiner Perkins, Mayfield, Mohr Davidow, Emergence Capital …etc.  Tomorrow we”ll have the honor of welcoming Ann Winblad, Partner, co-Founder of the first exclusively software-focused venture firm, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners.

These breakfast meetings are a valuable opportunity for Entrepreneurs, most of whom would probably have a hard time getting through the door to VC Partners. Since I’ve been through quite a few of these sessions, both as Entrepreneur and Moderator, let me share a few thoughts:

  • It’s a pressure-free environment, with no Powerpoint presentations, Business Plans…etc, just casual conversation; but it does not mean you should come unprepared!
  • Follow a structure, don’t just roam about what you would like to do, or even worse, spend all your time describing the problem, without addressing what your solution is.
  • Don’t forget “small things” like the Team, Product, Market..etc.
  • It would not hurt to mention how much you are looking for, and how you would use the funds…
  • Write down and practice your pitch, and prepare to deliver a compelling story in 3 minutes. You will have about 10 minutes, the first half of which is your pitch,  but believe me, whatever your practice time was, when you are on the spot, you will likely take twice as long to deliver your story. The second half of your time-slot is Q&A with the VC.
  • Bring an Executive Summary; some VC’s like it, others don’t.
  • Last, but not least, please be on time! I am not kidding… some of you know why I even have to bring this up. (Arriving an hour late to a one-and-a-half-hour meeting is NOT acceptable.)

Here’s the event info page, but unfortunately this one is sold out. 

See you in San Francisco!

 

post

Google vs. Microsoft: I Find Myself on the "Wrong" Side

I’m not exactly known as a Microsoft-fan (see earlier posts at the bottom), yet I can’t help but side with MS in the current Google vs Microsoft kerfuffle.  Apparently Google is not satisfied with the changes to Vista MS agreed to, and still claims that “Microsoft’s hardwiring of its own desktop search product into Windows Vista violates the final judgment in this case.”

Here’s the problem: there really should not be a product named Desktop Search. Only desktop find – and it’s not a product.  Being able to retrieve whatever I myself placed on my hard disk should be a fundamental feature of the computer – and that means the Operating System.  The fact is, for two decades Microsoft has failed to deliver this capability miserably and that opened up an opportunity for others, be it Google, Yahoo, or my personal favorite, Copernic.  I don’t have a Vista machine, and I don’t plan to buy one, so I really can’t compare how good the built-in MS search find is, and it doesn’t matter anyway.

The point is: now that Vista is (supposedly) capable to find stuff it placed on the computer, let’s not complain about the operating system finally doing what it should have been doing in the first place. Those who still do, might want to read this satirical (?) piece.

Related posts: ReadWriteWeb, Insider Chatter, Digital Daily, paidContent.org, Internet Marketing Monitor

My earlier posts re. Microsoft:

 

post

Startup CEO’s Don’t Do List

  • Do not call your company VaporTech. In fact do not call it Vapor-anything.
  • Do not lease a Ferrari and a Mercedes at the same time
  • Do not hire a former prosecutor as a corporate officer.

Vaportech CEO gets 30 months in jail.

 

post

Pmarca – Is the New Star Blog Losing Focus?

(I wonder if this becomes my suicide-post, as criticizing Marc Andreessen is a fairly risky move …  )

Marc’s  new blog has been a smash hit: day by day he’s been pumping out amazingly good content:

Seriously good thinking; great posts one-by-one.  VC/Blogger Fred Wilson says:

“I know this blog is dangerously close to a Marc Andreessen linkblog. But he’s just killing it right now”

He can’t help but link to him again and again.  The guy is good.  Fred’s partner, VC and fellow Enterprise Irregular Brad Feld says: Awesome Blogging From Marc Andreessen.  The ultimate compliment comes from startup Founder and blogger Dharmesh Shah:

“If you are a busy startup founder and don’t have much time to read, you should probably read Marc’s stuff instead of mine.”

But something happened yesterday.  Marc ventured onto new waters, handing out his turnaround plan in 9 easy steps for large companies.

Ouch!  This one hurts.    His wonder plan is highly simplistic fluff.  The kind of cookie-cutter plan you’d expect a freshly minted MBA pull out of his folder, drop off the CEO’s desk and walk away thinking he just saved the business.

Actually, I wonder if he really means what he says here – or is this post a parody?   Step 2 could be the giveaway:

But first, throw your predecessor completely under the bus.

As for Step 9:  You don’t exactly “re-launch” a major corporation from scratch. 

The more I read it the more I think Marc is just testing us, this is a satirical post.  Either way, I really hope he’ll return to technology, startups, entrepreneurship – something he is great in doing and writing about, and has the credibility for.

 

Update: ZDNet’s Larry Dignan finds the list comical, too.

 

post

The Web Office Smackdown – Why It Does Not Matter

Mighty Microsoft wants us to Say goodbye to Microsoft Office 2003, and I am happy to comply. In fact I already did.  Just not the way MS wanted me to: instead of Office 2007 I migrated to Office 2.0, and, given how many people read this post (around 60k so far), I am definitely not alone.

Ironically just hours after reading the Microsoft discussion on Techmeme, another one started– this time on Web Office Suite: Who’s Leading The Pack? I do have my (biased) opinion, but the short, perhaps surprising answer: it does not matter.   As to the bias, I am an Advisor to Zoho – so take everything I say with a grain of salt.  In fact take everything anyone says with a grain of salt – we’re talking about freely available systems, go ahead, try them yourself.  

My bias aside I still picked the apps I think keep me most productive, and for now it is Gmail from Google and all other services from Zoho.  Yes, this means there are a few things I prefer in Gmail over Zoho Mail – but I’m actually using both, and due to Gmail’s architecture and a trick in Zoho Mail, my email is always in sync, no matter which one I access.  Zoho Mail is currently in private beta, and I expect it to improve significantly before the public launch. (Yes, one day I don’t want to have to say I prefer Gmail )

For word processing, spreadsheet, presentation…etc. needs I do consider Zoho the better choice.    There is the quantitative approach taken by ReadWriteWeb, i.e. Zoho simply has far more productivity apps than Google – but to me it’s the quality of the individual services, and as such, it’s clearly a subjective assessment.  I’m in good company though – see the MIT Technology Review, Gartner and countless blogs  in agreement.

Integration between all these applications is an area where Zoho’s homegrown strategy is starting to show results: for a good example just look at how Zoho Meeting sessions (the product announced today) can simply be embedded into Zoho Show slides. Compare it to today’s big news: Google’s presentation product will be piecemeal-ed together from  technology and talent acquired from Zenter and previously Tonic Systems, and perhaps one day integrated with the other Google Apps acquired elsewhere.   With this acquisition Google is on equal footing with Zoho, says Om Malik.  I doubt it, but frankly, that statement is  quite a compliment to Zoho.smile_wink.  Anyway,  the shopping-spree vs. homegrown integrated products comparison reminds me of the Oracle vs. SAP match in the Big Boys League (Enterprise Software).

 

I’ve started this article by saying it does not matter who’s better.  Time to explain what I mean.  I have no doubt Google will be the Web Office Suite market leader. It’s so simple: Zoho has more applications, of better quality, more integrated – but they don’t have Google’s clout.  But this is not a winner-take-it-all, zero-sum game: all players, including Google and Zoho are creating a new, emerging market.  It’s not about slicing the pie yet, it’s about making sure the pie will be huge – and Google’s brand is the best guarantee to achieving that.  Little Zoho can be a tremendously successful business being second to Google.  There will always be room for a second .. third… perhaps fourth. Data privacy, the quality of the products, better service, or just having a choice – there will always be reasons for customers to opt for a non-Google solution.

There’s more.  Now that ZDNet’s Dan Farber “outed” it, we can talk about Zoho’s further plans, including Business Edition, coming later this year.  (Dan’s story is actually the best backgrounder on “all things Zoho” I’ve seen published recently – I guess it was a productive yacht partysmile_shades. )  Zoho does not stop at “Office” applications: Dan hints at ERP and other business applications.  Almost a year ago I wrote a (then) speculative post: From Office Suite to Business Suite, and being the lazy guy I am, I’ll just quote myself here:

How about transactional business systems?  Zoho has a CRM solution – big deal, one might say, the market is saturated with CRM solutions.  However, what Zoho has here goes way beyond the scope of traditional CRM: they support Sales Order Management, Procurement, Inventory Management, Invoicing – to this ex-ERP guy it appears Zoho has the makings of a CRM+ERP solution, under the disguise of the CRM label.

Think about it.   All they need is the addition Accounting, and Zoho can come up with an unparalleled Small Business Suite, which includes the productivity suite (what we now consider the Office Suite) and all process-driven, transactional systems: something like NetSuite + Microsoft, targeted for SMB’s.”

Hm… today some of the above is no longer pure speculation.  If I expected Google to be the Web Office market leader, I can’t even begin to predict what happens to hosted business applications. 

Google has no offering in this market, and although there was a lot of speculation about them buying Salesforce.com,  the “big announcement” was a disappointment.  Of course they could still pull off a deal – but I wouldn’t, if I were Google.  Don’t get me wrong: I would actually like to see Google enter this market, since they have the clout to effectively create and expand it. I even know who they should buy (no, it does not start with Z) – but that’s a subject of another post.

Summing it all up, I believe the winner of the “on-demand race” will not be Google, Zoho, or any of their competitors – the winners will be the customers who will have a lot more choice in picking the right business solutions later this year. 

Update (7/6): Zoho vs Google Docs, of all places at Google Operating System.

post

No, Inkjet Printers Won’t Be Fixed

Inkjet printers are filthy, lying thieves reports Ars Technica, referring to a new German study. They key issue isn’t that printers eat up too much ink; it’s the fact that they are lying, reporting the cartridge empty when sometimes half the ink is still available. The study also points out how multi-color cartridges need to be replaced when only one color is out.

It gets worse: some printers (like my HP All-in-One) refuse to print even using the black cartridge, when they think the color cartridge is out.

In fact it gets a LOT worse: my HP thingie refuses to SCAN, a clearly ink-free operation when it deems the cartridge dead. (Update: not just HP, here’s an EPSON example)

The really annoying thing about this is that all the manufacturers are aware of it but they do nothing to fix it” -says Tom Raftery

Of course they won’t, Tom.  It’s not a defect, it’s by design.  The printer industry has long switched to a subscription-based model, we just don’t call it that way.  Give away the printer (see stupid ad?)  we’ll get you by the refills…

It’s a big scam, and there’s nothing we can do about it.