Paul Kedrosky is surprised at the results of the in a WSJ survey on in-meeting email habits:
“This strikes me as unrealistic and “do what I say, not what I do”, but I’m curious what people think. Granted, perpetual in-meeting emailing is bad, but discrete checking once in a while is fine.”
I’m not surprised, in fact the survey asked about “feelings”, which to me translates to “do what I say, not what I do”. I voted “never OK”, but I do plead guilty to occasionally doing it.
I certainly disagree with Paul on “discrete checking once in a while is fine.” No, it’s NOT fine. But there is another side of the coin: my time, your time, everyone’s time is valuable – don’t waste it with endless, formal, long meetings. I would not think of checking email at a well-structured, efficiently run, productive and participatory meeting for fear of missing out on something important.
(Note: I took a snapshot of the poll 500 votes after Paul did, and the percentages are more or less the same, which indicates a fairly consistent public opinion).




Whenever I see a title “Please Don’t Buy This …” I pretty much expect just the opposite: the author would use the tricky title to promote his product. Not
From Norwegian Design firm
Apologies, I don’t mean to offend anyone… but there’s no other way to refer to Stanford Prof. Bob Sutton’s book,
And now we’re getting to the title of this post: the button on the left takes you to the

If it’s Web 2.0, it’s free – we’re quite used to that, but would you expect it in the real world?
) argued that people are inherently good. To prove his point, he created Terra Bite. Talk about putting your money where your mouth is… to the tune of 6 figures. But he does not run a charity, he plans to build a growing for-profit business. Will people pay (enough)? 
Recent Comments