post

Google Disappoints…

Gizmodo reports that Google is about to launch a fleet of 360° camera-equipped Chevy Cobalts on us, as part of its streetview program. Yes, you read it right: Chevy Cobalts. Whatever happened to hybrids, in fact Google-enhanced hybrids?

Tags: , , , , ,

post

Yahoo Completely Wiped Out

Has Yahoo ever existed?   I don’t see any trace of it… it’s all gone.  My.yahoo.com, the main yahoo pages … you name it, it’s all down.  

Until this morning I haven’t  realized just how dependent I’ve became on Yahoo, even though I hardly ever “actively” use it.  After seeing my.yahoo dead, I started to read blogs from TechMeme – wanted to save one to del.icio.us – yuck, it’s dead, too, since it’s now a Yahoo property.  Trying to load my blog takes forever – waiting for mybloglog to load – yet another Yahoo service.   How about Flickr?   Dead, too – it really looks like Yahoo is completely MIA.  smile_sad

 

post

Your $1,500 iPhone – the Cost of iDay

Were you in line to buy the first batch of iPhones on Friday? If so, you’re probably the proud owner of a $1,500 phone … at least. The base price for the two models is $499 and $599, but you probably could you resist getting some accessories. Did you spend 5 hours in line? 10? A day and a half like Robert Scoble? How much is your time worth?

If we’re looking at $100 an hour (and frankly, almost everyone in the famous Palo Alto line is in a higher bracket) the real cost of an average iPhone purchased on iDay could very well be $1,500 or more.

But hey, you could have done worse… by buying a spot from this poor(?) fellow for $5,000 (photo credit: Engadget). (Oh, wait, it came with a free chair, what a deal…)

The real losers are those who stood on line all day in the hope of making a quick buck on eBay. Corey Spring posted an analysis of 933 eBay auctions, and came to two conclusions:

  • Half (52%) of the iPhone auctions expired without a single bid,
  • Those that actually concluded with a deal, yielded an average profit of $54.43 (yes, a lousy fifty bucks).

Factoring in the time they spent in line (or the average $15/hour some paid for their “stand-ins”), it’s probably fair to say that eBayers are at a net loss. And they did not have the experience, either smile_omg

Update: The cutest iPhone users 🙂

Related posts: Scobleizer, Good Morning Silicon Valley, Official Zooomr Blog, Guardian Unlimited, Thomas Hawk’s Digital …, B.L. Ochman’s weblog, Incremental Blogger, Feld Thoughts , CNet, Newsvine and Macsimum News

Tags: , , ,

post

Zoho Office on Your iPhone

Are you already in line to get the iPhone?   Well, if your lucky (?) enough to walk away with one, you now have an online Office Suite to work with: Zoho released an updated, lightweight version of their Writer, Sheet, Show apps at iZoho.  You can create and edit documents, only view spreadsheets and presentations for now. Zoho will continue to improve these products.

It’s nice to have the ability to access your documents, but for longer work I will still prefer a large screen with a keyboard.  There may be a role for the cell phone though- see an earlier discussion with Sridhar on this. My interpretation of his “computing Nirvana”:

– the mobile phone brings the connectivity, browser and some personalization
– the actual work devices are the cheap displays, keyboards easily found anywhere.
– the apps and data are on the Net

Until then, enjoy iZoho.

 

Update (7/2):  Zoho Office is now available on Facebook, too.

 

Related posts: ZDNet,  WebWare, ReadWriteWeb, Wired, Deal Architect, Mashable,

 

post

G-Combinator :-)

Google offers funding to gadget developers:

  1. Grants of $5,000 to those who’ve built gadgets they’d like to see developed further.
  2. Seed investments of $100,000 to developers who’d like to build a business around the Google gadgets platform.

(hat tip: TechCrunch)

Update (6/28): This is now on top of TechMeme: Web Strategy, Googling Google, paidContent.org, Niall Kennedy’s Weblog, Online Marketing Blog, ReadWriteWeb, mathewingram.com/work, Search Engine Land

Tags: , , , , , , ,

post

Google vs. Microsoft: I Find Myself on the "Wrong" Side

I’m not exactly known as a Microsoft-fan (see earlier posts at the bottom), yet I can’t help but side with MS in the current Google vs Microsoft kerfuffle.  Apparently Google is not satisfied with the changes to Vista MS agreed to, and still claims that “Microsoft’s hardwiring of its own desktop search product into Windows Vista violates the final judgment in this case.”

Here’s the problem: there really should not be a product named Desktop Search. Only desktop find – and it’s not a product.  Being able to retrieve whatever I myself placed on my hard disk should be a fundamental feature of the computer – and that means the Operating System.  The fact is, for two decades Microsoft has failed to deliver this capability miserably and that opened up an opportunity for others, be it Google, Yahoo, or my personal favorite, Copernic.  I don’t have a Vista machine, and I don’t plan to buy one, so I really can’t compare how good the built-in MS search find is, and it doesn’t matter anyway.

The point is: now that Vista is (supposedly) capable to find stuff it placed on the computer, let’s not complain about the operating system finally doing what it should have been doing in the first place. Those who still do, might want to read this satirical (?) piece.

Related posts: ReadWriteWeb, Insider Chatter, Digital Daily, paidContent.org, Internet Marketing Monitor

My earlier posts re. Microsoft:

 

post

Trust Gmail Mail Fetcher? Think Twice.

Today I was surprised to see too many emails in a normally “slow” Gmail label.  Then I got the real surprise finding some of them were over a week old – yet they just arrived. smile_sad.  This label only has email fetched from another Gmail account.  OK, let’s check history:

Ouch. Mail Fetcher hasn’t bothered to check the source account for 10 days….

Gmail’s Mail Fetcher is a very useful feature. Other than the typical email consolidation, it can be used to merge several accounts, or the final and crucial step of your migration from the desktop to Gmail.  It’s more than useful: it’s crucial.

Just don’t trust it too much.Beta Software

 

Update: Other Google services also ailing today… 

post

The Web Office Smackdown – Why It Does Not Matter

Mighty Microsoft wants us to Say goodbye to Microsoft Office 2003, and I am happy to comply. In fact I already did.  Just not the way MS wanted me to: instead of Office 2007 I migrated to Office 2.0, and, given how many people read this post (around 60k so far), I am definitely not alone.

Ironically just hours after reading the Microsoft discussion on Techmeme, another one started– this time on Web Office Suite: Who’s Leading The Pack? I do have my (biased) opinion, but the short, perhaps surprising answer: it does not matter.   As to the bias, I am an Advisor to Zoho – so take everything I say with a grain of salt.  In fact take everything anyone says with a grain of salt – we’re talking about freely available systems, go ahead, try them yourself.  

My bias aside I still picked the apps I think keep me most productive, and for now it is Gmail from Google and all other services from Zoho.  Yes, this means there are a few things I prefer in Gmail over Zoho Mail – but I’m actually using both, and due to Gmail’s architecture and a trick in Zoho Mail, my email is always in sync, no matter which one I access.  Zoho Mail is currently in private beta, and I expect it to improve significantly before the public launch. (Yes, one day I don’t want to have to say I prefer Gmail )

For word processing, spreadsheet, presentation…etc. needs I do consider Zoho the better choice.    There is the quantitative approach taken by ReadWriteWeb, i.e. Zoho simply has far more productivity apps than Google – but to me it’s the quality of the individual services, and as such, it’s clearly a subjective assessment.  I’m in good company though – see the MIT Technology Review, Gartner and countless blogs  in agreement.

Integration between all these applications is an area where Zoho’s homegrown strategy is starting to show results: for a good example just look at how Zoho Meeting sessions (the product announced today) can simply be embedded into Zoho Show slides. Compare it to today’s big news: Google’s presentation product will be piecemeal-ed together from  technology and talent acquired from Zenter and previously Tonic Systems, and perhaps one day integrated with the other Google Apps acquired elsewhere.   With this acquisition Google is on equal footing with Zoho, says Om Malik.  I doubt it, but frankly, that statement is  quite a compliment to Zoho.smile_wink.  Anyway,  the shopping-spree vs. homegrown integrated products comparison reminds me of the Oracle vs. SAP match in the Big Boys League (Enterprise Software).

 

I’ve started this article by saying it does not matter who’s better.  Time to explain what I mean.  I have no doubt Google will be the Web Office Suite market leader. It’s so simple: Zoho has more applications, of better quality, more integrated – but they don’t have Google’s clout.  But this is not a winner-take-it-all, zero-sum game: all players, including Google and Zoho are creating a new, emerging market.  It’s not about slicing the pie yet, it’s about making sure the pie will be huge – and Google’s brand is the best guarantee to achieving that.  Little Zoho can be a tremendously successful business being second to Google.  There will always be room for a second .. third… perhaps fourth. Data privacy, the quality of the products, better service, or just having a choice – there will always be reasons for customers to opt for a non-Google solution.

There’s more.  Now that ZDNet’s Dan Farber “outed” it, we can talk about Zoho’s further plans, including Business Edition, coming later this year.  (Dan’s story is actually the best backgrounder on “all things Zoho” I’ve seen published recently – I guess it was a productive yacht partysmile_shades. )  Zoho does not stop at “Office” applications: Dan hints at ERP and other business applications.  Almost a year ago I wrote a (then) speculative post: From Office Suite to Business Suite, and being the lazy guy I am, I’ll just quote myself here:

How about transactional business systems?  Zoho has a CRM solution – big deal, one might say, the market is saturated with CRM solutions.  However, what Zoho has here goes way beyond the scope of traditional CRM: they support Sales Order Management, Procurement, Inventory Management, Invoicing – to this ex-ERP guy it appears Zoho has the makings of a CRM+ERP solution, under the disguise of the CRM label.

Think about it.   All they need is the addition Accounting, and Zoho can come up with an unparalleled Small Business Suite, which includes the productivity suite (what we now consider the Office Suite) and all process-driven, transactional systems: something like NetSuite + Microsoft, targeted for SMB’s.”

Hm… today some of the above is no longer pure speculation.  If I expected Google to be the Web Office market leader, I can’t even begin to predict what happens to hosted business applications. 

Google has no offering in this market, and although there was a lot of speculation about them buying Salesforce.com,  the “big announcement” was a disappointment.  Of course they could still pull off a deal – but I wouldn’t, if I were Google.  Don’t get me wrong: I would actually like to see Google enter this market, since they have the clout to effectively create and expand it. I even know who they should buy (no, it does not start with Z) – but that’s a subject of another post.

Summing it all up, I believe the winner of the “on-demand race” will not be Google, Zoho, or any of their competitors – the winners will be the customers who will have a lot more choice in picking the right business solutions later this year. 

Update (7/6): Zoho vs Google Docs, of all places at Google Operating System.

post

No, Inkjet Printers Won’t Be Fixed

Inkjet printers are filthy, lying thieves reports Ars Technica, referring to a new German study. They key issue isn’t that printers eat up too much ink; it’s the fact that they are lying, reporting the cartridge empty when sometimes half the ink is still available. The study also points out how multi-color cartridges need to be replaced when only one color is out.

It gets worse: some printers (like my HP All-in-One) refuse to print even using the black cartridge, when they think the color cartridge is out.

In fact it gets a LOT worse: my HP thingie refuses to SCAN, a clearly ink-free operation when it deems the cartridge dead. (Update: not just HP, here’s an EPSON example)

The really annoying thing about this is that all the manufacturers are aware of it but they do nothing to fix it” -says Tom Raftery

Of course they won’t, Tom.  It’s not a defect, it’s by design.  The printer industry has long switched to a subscription-based model, we just don’t call it that way.  Give away the printer (see stupid ad?)  we’ll get you by the refills…

It’s a big scam, and there’s nothing we can do about it. 

 

post

Atlassian: Is There a Message Behind the New Homepage?

Atlassian, makers of Confluence, the market-leading Enterprise Wiki has a new homepage. So what? – you may ask. Well, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this case is no exception. Two pointers (not that you need any):

  • Atlassian is a four-product company, and the old site reflected that.
  • Their original hit was Jira, later Confluence, as a downloadable product. They were somewhat late with a hosted version – but they delivered what the market wanted, and their numbers speak for themselves.

Times change. One would have to be blind not to see they are getting a new religion: (old page to the right, new one below)

Update: One would either have to be blind, or just look at the site at another time… as it turns out (see Mike’s comment below), the big banner is a rotating one… so much for going to SaaS Church together smile_embaressed Oh, well, if you want to find out more about Atlassian, you can attend their user conference in Boston on Palo Alto.