Archives for 2006

post

Microsoft and Oracle in Fight Again…

…over Religion.

Back in 1994 a fake “news release” made the rounds on the Internet about Microsoft acquiring the Catholic Church.  Apparently quite a few people took it seriously, as Mr Softie got flooded with phone calls, so eventually Microsoft had to release a denial (see bottom of above link).  I kinda wonder if the naive folks were the descendants of those who took Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds a bit too literally half a century before…

Well, the good old joke is reborn, but Microsoft is so passe, the acquirer this time is Oracle. (hat tip: Jeff Nolan) Hey, it certainly fits Oracle’s philosophy:
“Ellison described ORACLE’s long-term strategy to develop a scalable religious architecture that will support all religions through
emulation. A single core religion will be offered with a choice of interfaces according to the religion desired — “One religion, a couple of different implementations,” said Ellison.”

I’m a bit disappointed though.. the new joke is a verbatim copy of the old one, with the names updated.  I think “Oracle” should have considered today’s political realities and acquire ALL major religions.     I’m known for coming up with new name-combo’s (see Sakia, Nonyo, Nokirola, Spomment, Boomble) and would have a few ideas for the new World Religion, but out of respect for the “legacy” religions I’ll refrain from that exercise

I wonder when we’ll hear details of the  2.0 version, in which Google Acquires the World.

post

SVASE VC Breakfast Club with Claremont Creek Ventures

I’ll be moderating another SVASE  VC Breakfast Club session on Thursday, March 2nd  in Oakland, at Deloitte & Touche’s offices.  It’s an informal round-table where up to 10 entrepreneurs get to deliver a pitch, then answer questions and get critiqued by a VC Partner. We’ve had VC’s from Draper Fisher, Hummer Winblad, Kleiner Perkins, Mayfield, Mohr Davidow, Emergence Capital …etc.

Thursday’s featured VC is John Steuart, Managing Director, Claremont Creek Ventures. Event Information and registration is here.  

These sessions are an incredible opportunity for Entrepreneurs, most of whom would probably have a hard time getting through the door to a VC Partners.   Since I’ve been through quite a few of these sessions, both as Entrepreneur and Moderator, let me share a few thoughts:

  • It’s a pressure-free environment, with no Powerpoint presentations, Business Plans…etc,  just casual conversation, but it does not mean you should come unprepared!
  • Bring an Executive Summary, some VC’s like it, others don’t.
  • Follow a structure, don’t just talk freely about what you would like to do, or even worse, spend all your time describing the problem, without addressing what your solution is.
  • Don’t forget “small things” like the Team, Product, Market..etc.
  • It would not hurt to mention how much you are looking for, and how you would use the funds…
  • Write down and practice your pitch, be ready to deliver a compelling story in 5 minutes.  You will have more time, but believe me, whatever your practice time was, when you are on the spot, you will likely take twice as long to deliver your story.
  • Last, but not least, please be on time!  I am not kidding… some of you know why I have to even bring this up.

See you on Thursday … and now I get to show off my cool  Zvents button: Zbutton

Update:  We just got Crunch-ed. Thanks, Mike!

Tags: , , , , , , ,

post

Analyzing the Blog-Visitor Log

One can learn a lot from analyzing the visitors’ log.  I typically look for referrer sites, keywords, and my own most popular pages.  Today I’m baffled: the most frequent referrer site is my own TypeKey page.   Why? How do readers even get there?  I can’t figure it out, if anyone has an idea, please comment below.
Thanks.  

Tags: , , , , ,

post

Google – Sun(day) Rumor

GoogleSun   Blogcritics.org speculates that Google is about to buy ailing Sun.

Ahhh, Daniel, could you not have waited till Monday so I can load up on Sun shares?   At least that’s a stock I can afford, vs. Google.

Of course it’s a less ambitious speculation than mine .

Tags: , , , ,

post

Microsoft Blames Windows Explorer

Windows Vista Feb CTP Performance Problems? Try removing Windows Explorer! (via Jerry)

Also see: A Dead PC is a Safe PC – says Microsoft     
 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

post

Parody of Customer Support

Thank you for calling T-Mobile… All of our representatives are ….

… Current wait time is:  1 hour 9 minutes!  “

No, this is not a joke, this is for real.  They do offer a call-back option though.  

Tags: , , , ,

post

A Heck of a Good Hack of the Florida Voting Machines

Bush_goreThe internal logs of at least 40 Sequoia touch-screen voting machines reveal that votes were time and date-stamped as cast two weeks before the election, sometimes in the middle of the night.
Black Box Voting successfully sued former Palm Beach County (FL) Supervisor of Elections Theresa LePore to get the audit records for the 2004 presidential election.”  full article here.

Related Posts:

post

Patent Ransom

AJAX Patented. WTF?

Tomorrow I am filing a patent for:

  • driving a car to work
  • eating breakfast
  • breathing fresh air
  • sleeping

…. you name it. I’ll hold the whole country hostage

Update (2/23):  Everyone responds in shock.

Update (2/24):  Rich Media patent hype – is AJAX safe?  – good article, originally showed up here as a trackback. Neil, where are your manners, trackback without a link?  I’m deleting the trackback, but since the article is worth a read, I’ll point to it – with nofollow.

Tags: , , ,

 

post

BlogBeat Off(beat)

TechCrunch recently featured Blogbeat, a nice-looking blog analytics solution, a’la Measuremap.  I have doubts regarding their business model: after 30 days trial, $6 month.  That’s not a huge sum in itself, but when a pro-level blog platform (TypePad, Blogware ..etc) costs $8–11 a month, an add-on to it for $6 is relatively expensive.

That said, I wanted to give it a try. It’s way off. This morning it showed 70 less visitors then StatCounter, but I thought it may  be caused by time zone differences (the new calendar day starting at different hours).  However, by the afternoon the gap between the two systems grew to 115, so BlogBeat is definitely missing a few “beats”.  

Tags: , , , ,

post

Web 2.0 & Enterprise, Round 3: Enterprise Software for Small Businesses

(Updated)

This post is a continuation of Web 2.0 in the Enterprise – Round 2 in which I reflected on some thoughts brought up by Stephen Bryant in Five Reasons Web 2.0 and Enterprises Don’t Mix.

The Web 2.0 in the Enterprise TIE event I previously referred to was hectic, trying to cover way too many subjects in 90 minutes, with one common underlying assumption: Enterprise means large corporations. The theme of the night was how these Web 2.0 technologies and business/communication approaches will “seep in” to the large enterprise from the bottom up.
What is then Enterprise Software? Typically SAP, Oracle et al come to mind, and I can hear the roar “Enterprise Software is Dead” – well, is it?
If we define Enterprise Software as the traditional heavyweight, expensive, pay-huge-license-fees-upfront, then try-to-implement-forever model it is certainly challenged from two ends, by Open Source and the SaaS model. But there is another definition that is largely being overlooked:
Software that allows a company to conduct it’s everyday business, supporting most of the core, fairly standard business processes any company performs repeatedly.

With this definition, Enterprise Software has a whole new, largely unpenetrated market to enter: that of small businesses, referred to as the SMB or SME segment. Such enterprise functionality has traditionally been beyond reach for a typical small business, for two major reasons:

  • Cost (license, hardware, implementation, maintenance ..etc)
  • Lack of IT resources (integrating applications, designing processes, dealing with multiple vendors ..etc)

SaaS is the right answer for both, since it allows the SMB user to start using the functionality without an upfront investment, does not require implementation, upgrades, maintenance, worrying about backups and security ..etc.

Of course several Open Source packages are available completely free, which is a perfect solution for the cost problem, but I think most of these packages are by geeks for geeks; i.e. you really have to be quite IT-savy to implement, integrate, upgrade them, and as we stated most small businesses simply do not have that type of resource. Yes, that means the Silicon Valley tech-startups are not a true representation of the SMB world
Likewise, I don’t believe SOA, best-of-breed packages working together are an option for the SMB market, for the same reason. They will play an increasingly critical role in larger enterprises with a professional IT organization, but for a few more years SMB’s are far better off with integrated, All-In-One type On-Demand solutions.

Of the Web 2.0 companies Stephen mentions in Five Reasons Web 2.0 and Enterprises Don’t Mix two are offering Integrated On-Demand solutions:

  • NetSuite
    Stephen lists NetSuite along with Salesforce.com, and while they are in the same club, the significant difference is that Salesforce.com is only CRM, while NetSuite offers an integrated CRM+ERP package. They both are trying to become a “platform” via NetFlex and AppExchange, respectively. Both companies are definitely pushing upstream, going after the Enterprise market as in the first definition, i.e. large (or midsize) corporate customers.
  • 24SevenOffice
    Coming from Europe this company is lesser known. They focus on the SMB market and offer a modular but integrated system with a breath of functionality I simply haven’t seen elsewhere: Accounting, CRM (Contacts, Lead Mgt, SFA), ERP (Supply Chain, Orders, Products), Communication, Group Scheduling, HR, Project Management, Publishing, Intranet. Essentially a NetSuite+Communication, Collaboration. I’ve taken their test-drive (currently IE only) and liked it. I would debate how they structure their menu-system, as functions like Product, Inventory, SCM are all hidden under Financials.

Back to the economics: if SMB’s could not in the past afford Enterprise Software, the same held true for the Software Industry: they could not afford SMB’s, since there was just no way to make the numbers work. The cost of customer acquisition vs. the very low license fees made it an uneconomical model, whether via direct or channel sales.
Once again, technology comes to the rescue: the Internet, and largely Search Engine Marketing changes everything. Joe Kraus, Founder of JotSpot and previously Excite sums it up:
“ Ten years ago to reach the market, we had to do expensive distribution deals. We advertised on television and radio and print. We spent a crap-load of money. There’s an old adage in television advertising “I know half my money is wasted. Trouble is, I don’t know what half”. That was us. It’s an obvious statement to say that search engine marketing changes everything. But the real revolution is the ability to affordably reach small markets. You can know what works and what doesn’t. And, search not only allows niche marketing, it’s global popularity allows mass marketing as well (if you can buy enough keywords). “

Another benefit of SEM is that while traditional advertising can pick the right demographic groups, it cannot pick the right time, only a fraction of the target audience is in “change mode”, looking for a solution. That’s the beauty of Search Engine Marketing: obviously if you are searching, you have a problem and are looking for a solution, which is half a win from the vendor’s point of view.
Small Business Trends recently published a survey on “Selling to Small Businesses”, which supports the increasing importance of SEM: “A full 73% of vendors attract small business customers through search engine results”

Finally a quote from Ziff Davis again: “Products for the long tail and SMB market, where 72 million businesses spend $5k or less each year, are a much easier play” Wow, I don’t know where those numbers come from, but if I were a SMB-focused software vendor, I’d certainly like them … there’s a goldmine out there.

Update (2/22): Perfect timing for this report to come out just now: U.S. SMBs to Spend $2.2 Billion on Software in 2006, Says AMI-Partners

Update (4/17): Interprise Suite (recently debuted at Demo 2006) claims to be “The FIRST Accounting / ERP / CRM Solution to Bring the Power of the Internet to Small and Mid-sized Business“. While I take issue withe the claim to be “first”, considering the breadth of functionality it’s definitely an option to consider for SMB’s .

Related posts: