Corporate Logos Reflect Recession
Business, Humor December 22nd, 2008

From Flickr, originally published by Business Pundit, and re-discovered by Jeff Nolan. (Oh, yeah, I did my not-so-artistic-but-realistic rendering of the Apple logo a year ago.)
Update: Will some of these Web 2.0 logos change in 2009?
If Scoble Thinks He Found Bad Startup Marketing, He Ain’t Seen Nothing
Marketing / PR, Startups September 8th, 2008
If Robert Scoble thinks he found examples of poor startup marketing (Startups: your web site sucks) he ain’t seen nothing
. How about picking a name that almost actively drives visitors away?
A few months ago Ben Kepes drew my attention to Viisibility, and I promptly called out their really poor naming: how can they call their supply chain company Viisibility when there is already an ERP business named Visibility?
Now a friend who’s watching TechCrunch50 on site tells me he likes FairSoftware. OK, let’s check them out… what is so innovative about Fair / Trade Show management software, and it does not even appear to be a startup!
Hm… but Crunchbase says:
FairSoftware is the place to start and grow a virtual online business. It only takes a few clicks for software developers and website publishers to incorporate, hire and share revenue with other project members.
…
Bloggers, designers and developers can use FairSoftware to grow their business by working together online, without having to deal with the complexity and limitations of traditional corporations.
What’s wrong here? They picked a name with only the .net domain available: fairsoftware.net . Not too good… but perhaps not the end of the world – unless the .com version belongs to another software company. Now it’s a disastrous choice. Unless, of course if they already have a deal to acquire that domain.![]()
Update: iCharts is another one with the .net domain only, but it’s by far not as bad as FairSoftware. icharts.com does not appear to be a real business, just a parked domain whose owner is probably holding out for a high price. Hm… will they buy it?
Related articles by Zemanta
- Robert Scoble vs Startups at Demo’08
- Robert tonight you lost that shine
- Companies: has TechCrunch 50 or Demo spurned you?
- It’s Easy to Say Startups Suck When You Have Never Started One
- Scoble Sucks
- FairSoftware virtualizes startups
- Startups pitch new tools for business
- FairSoftware virtualizes startups
Tags: branding, brands, company name, Demo, demofall, domain, icharts, marketing, naming, pr, Startups, techcrunch50
The Startup Naming Game
Marketing / PR April 21st, 2008
Ben Kepes drew my attention to Viisibility, which appears to be a very interesting web based supply chain management / data clearing-house / hub type of a business.
At first reading I completely misread the name, thinking it was Visibility. Wow, what a great choice, I thought – a simple, common word that perfectly describes what the business is all about. But wait! try to Google it: it’s a bit difficult to find the relevant entries from the 47,100,000 hits Goggle found… That brings up question number one:
Do common words that describe your business perfectly but are hard to Google make good brands?
Robert Scoble has a simple rule: only pick names that do not come up on the major search engines at all.
But as it turns out I was wrong, just missing that extra “i”: the name is actually Viisibility. That brings up a whole new issue, which is my question number two:
Can intentionally misspelled common words that in pronunciation describe the product, but are only available as domains and are only unique on search because of the “typo” actually become Brands?
Last time I asked the question, the majority vote was yes (albeit with few participants). I used Vyew as an example, which I still think is a good name. But Viisibility’s case is a bit more complex, as shown by these two homepages:
- Viisibility: managing supply chains.
- Visiblity: ERP for Complex Manufacturing.
Oops. Not only there’s another company with a similar name, they are also in the same space, “differentiated” only by a typo. I’m afraid it’s not much of a differentiation, I can’t help but think Viisibility is a poor choice for a brand.
But forget the extreme case above, I’d like to return to the generic question, and run the poll again, especially as I’ve gained a few marketers as readers since last time. If you read this in a feed reader, there’s a chance the poll does not work, so please click through the blog title to vote:
Update (4/22): The Importance of a Good Name @TechCrunch.
Tags: branding, brands, company name, domain, marketing, naming, product name, trademark, viisibility, visibility, vyew, zoho polls
Bite the Hand that Feeds You?
Collaboration, Marketing / PR, Personal Productivity, Startups November 22nd, 2007
There’s a new online Office player in town: Sabeer Bhatia, co-founder of Hotmail, the web-mail service that perfected viral marketing and got acquired by Microsoft for $400 million, unveiled his free web-office suite yesterday. It does not look at Google, Zoho or ThinkFree, it aims at Microsoft directly:
“We are just a few years away from the end of the shrink-wrapped software business. By 2010, people will not be buying software,” Mr Bhatia said. “This is a significant challenge to a proportion of Microsoft’s revenues.”
So be it – I am a certified web-app fanboy. I’m still waiting for my trial account (and wonder if I will ever get it after this post) , so I can’t comment on the applications themselves, but I think Mr. Bhatia’s choice of a name is rather tasteless: Live Documents. What’s wrong with that? Nothing.. except the close resemblance to Microsoft’s Windows Live brand. I only have “conspiracy theories” here:
- Live Documents is a shameless rip-off of the MS brand, Mr. Bhatia is literally biting the hand that fed him and indirectly funded this company.
- He is riding on Microsoft’s coat-tails: his application is (supposedly) very similar to MS Office 2007, he offers a plug-in to the MS products, uses the MS Office logo quite liberally throughout his site, people know his background with MS – all this creates the impression that his products is somehow jointly developed with Microsoft. (?) While this may help gaining traction initially, I think confusing customers is a very-very bad policy. (But what do I know, I haven’s sold a business for $400M
) - Finally, the most far-fetched speculation: this is indeed Microsoft’s secret weapon, named appropriately so it fits easily after it’s absorbed in a $billion+ deal.
I can’t wait to hear from Microsoft… Don? Cliff? Chris? Anyone?
Update (11/23): Dan Farber on ZDNEt came to the same conclusions – literally.
Update #2: As much as I don’t like the Live copycat, I have to admit calling it “service plus software” is a smart play on Microsoft’s “software plus service“, indicating the shift in priorities. ![]()
Related stories: Times Online, Techspot, Macworld UK, PC Advisor, Digital Inspiration, Between the Lines, /Message, Rough Type , deal architect, Zoho Blogs, TECH.BLORGE.com, Read/WriteWeb, TechCrunch, Betaflow.
Tags: brands, Google, hotmail, live documents, marketing, microsoft, thinkfree, windows live, zoho
FairSoftware is the place to start and grow a virtual online business. It only takes a few clicks for software developers and website publishers to incorporate, hire and share revenue with other project members.![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=41309ca0-6045-4739-a300-8e79b5b4e1e2)



Zoli Erdos