post

Steal and be Proud of it?

Layout Stealer I can’t believe this: somebody created a program to STEAL the layout of other sites, and has the  *** to openly call it “layout stealer”:  

Hi Everybody!

    I would just like to let you know about an awesome tool that I have created called the LayoutStealer.  This tool will revolutionize the way people style their MySpace, Xanga’s or websites.  What the tool does is it extracts the HTML style coding, or “layout”, of a persons MySpace or website and returns the HTML code to you for use in your MySpace or Site.  This tool is nice because everyone can share layouts with ease, also the tool is very simple, and it works for any website.  So please try it out and spread the word about the LayoutStealer

It even got digged .. hopefully won’t stay up long.

Tags: , , , , ,

post

Skobee = Evite 2.0. A Web 2.0 Recipe

Simple recipe:

Evite 1.) Take a good old business model, in this case evite.  (hm, I take it back, evite has never been a business, it had to be acquired, but it’s a good service).

2.) Sprinkle it with some new features (ahh.. again, self-correction, these are not really new features, just existing ones done more comfortably, using natural language processing vs. forms, polls…etc)

3.) Add a cute 2.0–style Plans_splash user interface.

4.) Get announced on TechCrunch.

Off you go, Scobee Skobee

Have I missed anything?

P.S.  It’s cute though, next time I organize a party I may use this instead of Evite – but will this be a business? 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

post

Google No Longer Funny

They used to have this message whenever Gmail went down:
“ Cross your fingers and try again in a few minutes”

I guess they’re now a serious company, Gmail dies just as frequently (like right now)  but the message is:
“We’re sorry, but Gmail is temporarily unavailable. We’re currently working to fix the problem — please try logging in to your account in a few minutes.”

Oh well, growing (?) pains …

Update: Thanks to SiliconBeat, now we know what it is… it’s a:


Oops, this could be bad:

Tags: , , , ,

post

Google Calendar and the TechCrunch Babel

(Updated)

Here’s proof  on how International TechCrunch’s readership is.  This morning Mike leaked some information about Google’s long awaited calendar,  which apparently won’t be called GCalendar, but CL2  (is that a chemical formula or what? ).

Before we lazy Californians woke up, he already had 89 comments, close to half non-English.  By the time I finished writing this, comments are up to 103.. see samples below.  (Update: the number is likely over 103 now, but my blogging platform is

down, who knows when I’ll be able to post it .. and in the meantime

TechCrunch appears to be down, too .. what a day!)

Btw., where is Chandler?

  1. Pingback by pixelschrubber » Blog Archive » CL2 — March 8, 2006 @ 12:59 am

    […] Schalalalala…er wir entwickelt: Der CL2, also known as Google Calendar. Mehr darüber hier: http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/exclusive-screenshots-google-calendar/ […]

  2. Pingback by AboutDigital.ru » CL2 — March 8, 2006 @ 1:01 am

    […] Не буду переводить и комментировать эту стью в TechCrunch. Лучше посмотрите сами и оцените! Впечатляет! Тяжелые времена будут у других календарных сервисов… Google рулит! […]

  3. Trackback by techmonster — March 8, 2006 @ 1:04 am

    Google Kalender CL2…

    Schon lange wurde darüber geschrieben und es gingen auch einige Bilder durchs Netz – jetzt tauchen erneut Bilder des bald erwarteten Google Kalender CL2 im Netz auf. Michael Arrington schreibt in seinem Blog das er nun neue Bilder hat….

  4. Trackback by Julien Carnelos Blog — March 8, 2006 @ 1:20 am

    Le Google Calendar arrive……

    Vu sur TechCrunch,
    le calendrier google pointe le bout de son nez….

  5. Pingback by Luca Mondini » Blog Archive » — March 8, 2006 @ 1:30 am

    […] Sono disponibili in anteprima su TechCrunch, i primi screenshot di Google Calendar, applicazione di cui era previsto il lancio qualche mese fa. CL2, questo il nome del progetto, è invece ancora in beta e lo sarà, almeno secondo quello che riporta l’autore del post, Michael Arrington. La fuga di notizie, grazie ad uno dei 200 beta tester coinvolti, ci lascia intuire che CL2 sarà assolutamente integrato con GMail e permetterà la creazione, la ricerca e la condivisione di eventi. E’ probabile inoltre che l’aggregazione di eventi, in stile Eventful, sia implementata. Ai fan della grande G o delle applicazioni Web 2.0 non resta che aspettare, io continuerò ad utilizzare nel frattempo il mio D*I*Y Planner… […]

  6. Trackback by Abundando — March 8, 2006 @ 1:44 am

    Más pantallazos de Google Calendar…

    Podéis encontrarlos en un post de Techcrunch: Exclusive Screenshots: Google Calendar….

  7. Pingback by Details und Screenshots zu Google Calendar at RAINonline — March 8, 2006 @ 1:46 am

    […] Auf TechCrunch und GigaOM findet ihr die ersten Details und Screenshot zu “CL2&Prime – oder Google Calendar. […]

  8. Pingback by Textw�ste » Blog Archive » Google Calendar — March 8, 2006 @ 2:27 am

    […] Im Moment wehen einige Ger�chte �ber ein neues Google Produkt durch das Internet: den “Google Calendar”. TechCrunch hat jetzt Screenshots ver�ffentlicht und gibt auch sonst ein wenig Einblick. […]

  9. Trackback by meneame.net — March 8, 2006 @ 2:41 am

    Imagenes exclusivas del nuevo google calendar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!…

    Primeras imagenes oficiales del proximo lanzamiento de google…

  10. Pingback by 还没想好 » 真正的Google CL2 — March 8, 2006 @ 2:44 am

    […] 更多图片 […]

  11. Pingback by Las capturas de Google Calendar — Proletarium — March 8, 2006 @ 2:48 am

    […] TEch Crunch es como el New York Times de internet, tiene acceso a cosas que nadie tiene, hoy han publicado las primeras capturas dignas de Google Calendar (¡por fin!): […]

  12. Pingback by BlueAce » Google’s Office komt dichterbij dankzij CL2 — March 8, 2006 @ 2:51 am

    […] TechCrunch heeft de scoop met nieuwe screenshots van een nog te releasen kalender dienst van Google: CL2. CL2 makes it easy — even effortless — to keep track of all the events in your life and compare them to what your friends and family have going on in theirs.    […] 

  13. Trackback by meneame.net — March 8, 2006 @ 2:54 am

    Anlise do Google Calendar…

    Ainda no abriu mas esta revista j fez a anlise. Parece interessante….

  14. Pingback by google calendar at quintal do xanato — March 8, 2006 @ 3:01 am

    […] jah ha algum tempo que os rumores comecaram a aparecer mas desta parece que eh mesmo a serio. podem ver com o que se vai parecer o cl2 (eh o nome da coisa e ainda bem porque nohs jah temos um cl), e sempre ajuda a passar o tempo ateh estar disponivel. […]

  15. Trackback by Error500 — March 8, 2006 @ 3:04 am

    Imágenes de Google Calendar ¿o CL2?…

    Primeras imágenes de lo que será el Google Calendar, aunque al parecer el nombre oficial será CL2. Las tienen en …

  16. Pingback by Desinformados » Primeras im�genes de Google Calendar — March 8, 2006 @ 3:42 am

    […] La gente de TechCrunch (c�mo no) se ha hecho con las primeras im�genes de Google Calendar CL2, lo cual est� creando un buzz impresionante. Al contrario que los anteriores fakes, Michael Arrington afirma que estos screenshots fueron filtrados por trabajadores de Google, e incluye todas las im�genes con que se ha hecho y una buena descripci�n del servicio. Puedes verlo en este enlace. […]

    Pingback by MTYBlogs » CL2 — March 8, 2006 @ 4:07 am

  17. […] Al parecer este será el nombre del Google Calendar que ya arrojó sus primeras imágenes que pueden ser vistas en Techcrunch y una explicación mas detallada la puede ver en Error 500. […]

  18. Pingback by .. — March 8, 2006 @ 4:17 am

    […] 然後文章中列出一些cl2的功能,看起來相當不錯,真令人期待 Exclusive Screenshots: Google Calendar […]

  19. Trackback by kbglob — March 8, 2006 @ 4:26 am

    Google Calender…

    Ya estan empezando a aparecer algunos datos adicionales y screenshots del Google Calender.
    Tiene la misma interfaz que Gmail, y la simpleza de todas las aplicaciones de Google.

    ……

  20. Pingback by .:: www.marlonguerios.com ::. » Google Calendar em vista — March 8, 2006 @ 4:27 am

    […] Para saber mais: Exclusive Screenshots: Google Calendar […]

  21. Pingback by Effair | Billet | Google Calendar — March 8, 2006 @ 4:29 am

    […] Des screenshots de CL2, le nouveau logiciel de calendrier de Google. […]

  22. Pingback by savek blog » Archiwum bloga » Screenshots: Google Calendar — March 8, 2006 @ 6:25 am

    […] Screeny z nowego narzędzia Google: Exclusive Screenshots: Google Calendar. […]

  23. Pingback by Macsira.com » Capturas de Google Calendar — March 8, 2006 @ 6:28 am

    […] Aquí podeis ver el resto « Instalar Linux en un iPod 5G   […]

  24. Pingback by Blog de Dr. Max Glaser » Blog Archive » Mas informaciones sobre Google Calender — March 8, 2006 @ 6:40 am

    […] Hoy dia, en el blog de techcrunch han aparecido una serie de screenshots de Google Calendar. […]

  25. Pingback by ENGRENAGEM – Media e Tecnologia: blog sobre jornalismo, citizen journalism, blogosfera e novas tecnologias — March 8, 2006 @ 6:55 am

    […] Uma fuga fez chegar � Web screenshots do Google Calendar. […]

Update (3/8): Related posts:

Tags: , , , , , , ,

post

The Solution to your GDS Problem is CDS

I can’t believe it: Google Desktop Search cannot track changes when you move files from a directory to another.  That means the more you use your computer, the more your index will be out of sync. Perhaps that’s why they did not name it Desktop Find, because it only searches, does not find!

The recommended solution: uninstall GDS, then install it again…then wait a few hours for the complete reindex.   WTF?   The whole idea of an indexing program that I should  not even know about it .. .it should do its thing in the background, as if it wasn’t there at all. 

I have a better solution: get Copernic Desktop Search.  It does not steal your data, does not come with a bunch of additional bloatware, it only does one thing, but does it really well: find and serve up your data.  The screenshot below shows the powerful update options.

Related posts:

Tags: , , , , ,

post

Watching wetpaint Dry :-)

Wetpaint(Updated)

I know it’s a cheap shot,  but I’m impatient, so trying to watch the demo tour of wetpaint really felt like watching wet paint dry Perhaps everyone’s over there now, having read SiliconBeat’s writeup.  

Joke apart, I could not care less how slow the tour is, if it delivers.  I’ve written about the importance of mathching the right tools with one’s objectives, and how a combination of blogs, wikis and forums can create a dynamic, live personal webspace.  I’m using both SocialText and JostSpot, and while I find them easy enough, they clearly are after the corporate market.  Wetpaint says it will “to combine the community-building aspects of online forums with the publishing ease of wikis and blogs”.   If it really does (had no time to test it yet), it might just be the perfect tool for everyday individuals.

Update (3/6):  Wetpaint may not be the set of individual productivity tools I thought it was.  It’s part of a community-building effort, the currently available communities being: dogs, cancer, bird flu, Democrats, Republicans and Xbox 360. Hm… I think I’ll pass .. for a while.  I left my email address though, to be notified when it will become available to create one’s own site.  More info here and here.

Update (3/6):  Ahh, watch those servers guys,  you’ve just got TechCrunched

Update (3/7):  More posts, reviews:

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

post

SaaS vs. Open Source for SMB’s? A No-Brainer.

(Update)
I have to take issue with Paul Gillin’s approach as he discusses whether SMB’s are better off with SaaS or Open Source Applications. If we equate Open Source to downloadable, on-premise installed software, I have no doubt, and have stated it before that the only good answer is SaaS. But, hold on, a few minutes later we’ll see these two options may not be mutually exclusive for long.

Paul analyzes several criteria:

  • cost
  • speed of deployment
  • customization
  • reliability
  • data ownership
  • vendor viability

These are all issues well-discussed on the web, and although Paul does not explicitly say, my reading is that he also leans towards the SaaS conclusion. The problem is that this criteria-by-criteria approach works well with a typical (mid-size) company where some level of IT expertise is present. Small Business America is very different from the web-savy geeky software startups; the majority are more traditional businesses with no CIO, IT department, in fact often without any IT support whatsoever. While the two main obstacles SMB’s face with any on-premise implementation are cost and (lack of) IT expertise, you can’t just translate the latter into cost – i.e. the cost of hiring full-time IT support. The opportunity cost of Management venturing into IT hiring and project decisions instead of focusing on their primary business makes this an impractical approach, leaving us with only one choice: SaaS.

Another issue not discussed in the article is integration. Open Source or SaaS, getting several packages work together requires IT and business process expertise, which typically means hiring expensive consultants. Therefore, I would go one step further: not only SaaS is the best choice for most SMB’s but they should seek to minimize the number of providers, i.e. the best choice is to use integrated All-In-One solutions.

The current undisputed leader in this field is NetSuite, but as they follow Salesforce.com’s footsteps and move upstream chasing midsize businesses, they leave an opening for up-and-coming challenger 24SevenOffice, which focuses solely on SMB’s, and covers a wider range of business functionality than the incumbent.

This is the situation today. Now, let’s revisit the original question: SaaS or Open Source? A tiny startup named SQLFusion is working on making that question obsolete. The dilemma with Open Source: a lot of good applications are available, but they are written by geeks for geeks… you really have to be quite knowledgeable to download and implement them. Example: at one of the startups I am advising I use SugarCRM over the internet. Starting to use it was a no-brainer, but when I looked at the prerequisites and the process of installing it myself, my head started spinning. No way, this is not for me! Open Source Fusion, which I hear is within days of opening for a limited beta will bridge the gap between availability and usability of Open Source Programs, by offering such apps to be used over the Internet. In true On-Demand fashion, maintenance, upgrades all happen in the background, one can start using the programs without implementing them. So it will no longer be SaaS or Open Source, but SaaS and Open Source.

The first incarnation of Open Source Fusion will provide access to individual applications, still leaving the integration dilemma for SMB’s, but the technology under the hood enables the company to later offer an integration layer between the key applications it serves up.

So the future is Open Source Software as a Service. Hm, here’s an ugly acronym: OSSaaS (?)

Update (3/6). Releated posts:

Update (5/23): Stefan over at The Small Business Blog discusses the issue; his company, WinWeb is expected to offer Open Source apps as a service soon.


post

Blogs To Replace Personal Websites

(Updated)

I don’t think this is a radically new idea: personal websites are so 20th century – Blogs bring them to life, and they are easier to set up. As Don Dodge says,Blogs are two way, in fact many way, communication where the readers create a conversation by leaving comments, trackbacks, and links. Web sites don’t lend themselves to leaving comments and starting a conversation.

I think for most individuals a blog offers more power, flexibility, ability for self-expression and dialogue, than a static website. There are a few tricks, however, if you feel the need to have a permanent front-page. Several blog-platforms allow for “sticky posts”. Create only one sticky post, this will always stay at the top, i.e it can become your “static” home page. Smart use of titles, icons, graphics with URL’s in the sticky post, surrounded by categories, lists in the sidebars can turn the “sticky” into the point of entry for several parts of your blog – a’la traditional websites.

Some blog-platforms (e.g. Blogware by Blogharbor, the one I use) also cater for creating classic, static Web pages, allow you to FTP content up to your site, have photo albums ..etc. The static pages don’t automatically become part of your blog categories or your main page, giving you the freedom of freely mix and match with the blog. You could use the static page as your homepage (like the sticky described above) ,or you could call it from a link in a blog post – making sure that’s the only way to access it, someone cannot stumble upon the standalone page without reading the post.

The static page, the sticky post, or badges on your sidebar could also become the launching pad to a personal wiki (SocialText and JotSpot both offer free personal versions) , to your documents in Writely, or to any number of Web 2.0 app’s. It doesn’t matter that all these services are hosted on different servers by different companies, you can bring them all together on your launchpad page.

I recently wrote about using wiki’s to create an Instant Intranet for companies – if you have any projects that require collaboration with others, you can do the same, making it part of your static page.

With all these tools available, who needs a traditional web-page?

Related posts:

Update (3/22): Apparently not just personal sites: Steve Rubel reports Another Company Goes Blog Only

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

post

Wikis are the Instant Intranet

(Updated)

Since I received a few questions after my post: 43 Wiki Prank and the Whiteboard Test, I though I should add a bit of clarification. The underlying thought in that article was to pick the right tool for the right situation, and the whiteboard-test is just one trick to differentiate when Wiki’s are helpful vs. Forum, Blog ..etc software. It’s by far not the only situation when a wiki is invaluable.

Another example is setting up a living, breathing Intranet, one that people can actually use. Anybody who works in large corporations probably thinks of the IntraNet as a one-way communication channel for Management to talk (down) to employees. Getting your own content in? Forget it! Even when I was VP in a mid-sized organization and did not have wait for approval, I still had to talk to the IT Director, wait for him to fit it in his team’s schedule, then tell him what was wrong when my content finally showed up.

It does not have to be this way! Companies “own” (well, at least part of the day) the intellectual capacity of their employees, so why not put it to work? Even in the large corporate environment a wiki can be a lively collaborative addition to the Intranet (see the wiki effect by Ross), but for smaller, nimble, less hierarchical business a wiki is The Intranet.

At a much smaller organization I wanted to introduce a wiki for collaboration, for all the reasons explained in the video below. The company was a bit more old-fashioned, not exactly the early-adopter type. I expected some resistance against something with a geeky-funny name like wiki… so I simply announced we’ll be creating an editable Intranet. People started to use it from day 1, and few cared that the thingie behind is called a wiki.

David Terrar describes a somewhat similar story here.

Finally, the excellent video by JotSpot Founder Joe Kraus.

Other related posts:

Update (4/9): A really good guide to wikis by David Terrar.

Update (10/22): Here’s a case study of Confluence, the leading enterprise wiki being used as the ExtraNet.

Update (4/9/07): Read/WriteWeb on The Age of Instant Intranets.

Update (9/20/08)A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Intranet

post

43 Wiki Prank and the Whiteboard Test

Weblogswork is making fun of Ross Mayfield using a wiki for everything. Ok, so it’s really Alex Muse’s idea, check out his story. They set up and CrunchNotes announced the 43 Best Blogs page, which is open for anyone to edit. Of course Ross typically ends up selling / using / donating Socialtext wikis for the right purpose, while this 43thingie is just a mess. I could have my 5 minutes of fame by inserting myself in the #1 position. Not that being a mess is bad … I suppose it’s just a cool prank to get some buzz and attention – otherwise a digg-like voting system would make more sense.

Let’s use this opportunity though to make a point: wikis are a wonderful productivity tool, they help cut down on the flood of email we’re all buried under, reduce “occupational spam” (those unnecessary CC’s, even worse, BCC’s) ..etc…etc…etc. But most importantly, a wiki is for collaboration. Not everything we do is a collaborative effort, and as such, a wiki is not always the best tool to use. Key in picking the right tool is the intention, the desired outcome of the communication.

For ad-hoc, one-to-one, or one-to-some type communication email is still the winner. Blogs are the best for one-to-many regular communication and dialogue. When the value is in the individual contributions, preserving their original content and sequence, traditional forum software is probably the best. Movie-, book-, product reviews are typical examples, for example I would question that Amazon’s ProductWiki is such a good idea. (well, it is, if you enjoy wiki-wars).

The simple “whiteboard-test” helps determine when wikis are really helpful: if ideally you’d like to have all participants of your conversations together in a room, where anyone can walk up to the whiteboard, wipe off content, correct, overwrite what others done until the group collectively reaches the desired outcome, then you should use a wiki. In other words it’s not the debate, the process, the individual arguments that matter, but the synthesis of the collective wisdom. (actually, you get all the other stuff from the change logs). It’s clearly easier to use wikis in a self-controlled environment, like project teams, companies … essentially any team driving towards a common purpose, but Wikipedia is proof that collaboration can be achieved with Pigeonthe open community at large, too.

For everything else, there is always good old pigeon-mail.

Related posts: