Cloud Computing and Open Source are Not Enemies
SaaS September 29th, 2008
Image via Wikipedia
Are Open Source and Cloud Computing anachronistic enemies? You’d think so, if you read GNU creator Richard Stallman’s interview in The Guardian:
Cloud computing was simply a trap aimed at forcing more people to buy into locked, proprietary systems that would cost them more and more over time.
"It’s stupidity. It’s worse than stupidity: it’s a marketing hype campaign,"
Sure, there’s a lot of marketing hype as it is typical with any major technological advancement, especially as it reaches the peak of its hype cycle. But I think Stallman loses sight of who the “enemy” is.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Stallman on cloud computing: Run, it’s a trap! [The Olds]
- No Silver Linings!
- Are Cloud Computing and Open Source Arch-Enemies?
- Richard Stallman vs Cloud Computing
- Stupid Redux : Old Man GNU Yells at Cloud
- Hey hey, you you – get off of my cloud
- Cloud computing is a trap, warns GNU founder Richard Stallman (Bobbie Johnson/Guardian)
Tags: cloud computing, deki wiki, gnu, netsuite, Open Source, oracle, proprietary software, SaaS, wordpress
Cloudy Fusion
Enterprise Software, Humor, SaaS September 28th, 2008
Image by wicho via Flickr
The Enterprise Irregulars took over CloudAve… well, sort of, forcing us to release an article early. Eran Kampf had a post lined up for Monday morning about Larry Ellison’s Cloud Envy, when all of a sudden fellow Irregular Anshu Sharma had a humor attack and came out with a hilarious post. All he did was replace Cloud Computing with Fusion in Larry’s famous rant, and voila!:
"The interesting thing about Fusion is that we’ve redefined Fusion to include everything that we already do. I can’t think of anything that isn’t Fusion with all of these announcements. The computer industry is the only industry that is more fashion-driven than women’s fashion. Maybe I’m an idiot, but I have no idea what anyone is talking about. What is it? It’s complete gibberish. It’s insane. When is this idiocy going to stop?"
"We’ll make Fusion announcements. I’m not going to fight this thing. But I don’t understand what we would do differently in the light of Fusion other than change the wording of some of our ads. That’s my view."
Wow. This variant of Ellison’s speech makes a lot of sense, referring to his own elusive Fusion applications. Even Vinnie Agrees. ![]()
Related articles by Zemanta
- Old Man Oracle Yells At Cloud
- Its not just us that think that Cloud Computing is a tad overblown….
- Cloud Computing is Hyped and Overblown, Forrester’s Frank Gillett…..Big Tech Companies Have "Cloud Envy"
- Larry Ellison on cloud computing buzzword: "Complete gibberish" [Quotable]
Tags: buzzwords, cloud computing, Enterprise Software, fusion, Humor, hype, larry ellison, oracle
The Enterprise Irregulars Button Up
Business, Humor November 13th, 2007
As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.. so I’ll save you the agony of reading through 3000 words, let the photos speak for themselves:
The Enterprise Irregulars with SAP Board Member Peter Zencke
The Enterprise Irregulars with SAP CEO Henning Kagermann
The Enterprise Irregulars with Oracle President Charles Phillips
Do you see what I see? Is there a trend here? I defer further analysis to our in-house fashionistas. ![]()
Tags: business attire, Enterprise irregulars, fashion, Humor, oracle, sap
Betting on the NetSuite IPO
Business, ERP / CRM, Enterprise Software, SMB / SME, SaaS, Software, Technology December 6th, 2006
(Updated)
Phil Wainewright at ZDNet is running a poll on whether NetSuite will have a chance to go ahead with the long-awaited IPO or it will get folded back into the Empire.

I’m somewhat surprised by the above results, but since this is an early snapshot, please check the live poll for the current vote count.
Surprise or not, acquisition by Oracle is a realistic scenario, considering Larry Ellison’s close to 60% stake in NetSuite. This is certainly fellow Enterprise Irregular Jason Wood’s take.
I tend to believe that NetSuite is better off being an independent business; there are just too many differences for a merger to work well, and I don’t mean only technical, product-related differences. NetSuite is still largely a small business (SMB) player, and that’s a market that requires an entirely different Sales and Marketing approach, amongst others, and Oracle with it’s current “legacy” salesforce just can’t reach this market profitably. If your products are different, your target market is different, your organization, corporate culture are different, where’s the synergy? Big behemoth Oracle would kill NetSuite – Larry is better off with a portfolio approach, cashing in a 10-digit return![]()
Talk about the SMB market – there really is no such thing. “SMB” was sufficient to describe the market to avoid, but now that the software industry is getting ready to actually address the needs of this segment, it’s too heterogeneous to be lumped together.A $100M business is just as different from a ten-person startup as it is from a Fortune 1000 company. When analysts talk about SMB, they really have the mid-market in mind; when SAP is announcing new SMB initiatives, it targets $100-$200M companies.
The forgotten “long tail” represents a huge untapped opportunity: millions of (very) small businesses that can now directly be reached, sold to, serviced inexpensively over the Net – classic SaaS style. Different markets require different organizations – NetSuite serves this segment much better than Oracle (or SAP, for that matter) ever could. In fact SAP would be wise to copy this chapter from Ellison’s book: it should get it’s own “NetSuite” by investing in (not acquiring) an up-and-coming small-business focused All-in-One SaaS provider, like European 24SevenOffice. The next NetSuite.
Update (12/11): NetSuite Gets Ready For Its Close-Up by BusinessWeek.
Update (12/19): TechCrunch is running a story titled NetSuite’s Going Public, Looking for $1 Billion Valuation. I don’t know if it’s based on new information or …. (?)
Tags: 24sevenoffice, acquisitions, all-in-one, crm, erp, ipo, ipo market, irregulars, m&a, mergers, netsuite, On-Demand, oracle, SaaS, sap, smb, sme, vsb
Web 2.0 & Enterprise, Round 3: Enterprise Software for Small Businesses
Business, ERP / CRM, Enterprise Software, Marketing / PR, SMB / SME, SaaS, Software February 22nd, 2006
(Updated)
This post is a continuation of Web 2.0 in the Enterprise – Round 2 in which I reflected on some thoughts brought up by Stephen Bryant in Five Reasons Web 2.0 and Enterprises Don’t Mix.
The Web 2.0 in the Enterprise TIE event I previously referred to was hectic, trying to cover way too many subjects in 90 minutes, with one common underlying assumption: Enterprise means large corporations. The theme of the night was how these Web 2.0 technologies and business/communication approaches will “seep in” to the large enterprise from the bottom up.
What is then Enterprise Software? Typically SAP, Oracle et al come to mind, and I can hear the roar “Enterprise Software is Dead” – well, is it?
If we define Enterprise Software as the traditional heavyweight, expensive, pay-huge-license-fees-upfront, then try-to-implement-forever model it is certainly challenged from two ends, by Open Source and the SaaS model. But there is another definition that is largely being overlooked:
Software that allows a company to conduct it’s everyday business, supporting most of the core, fairly standard business processes any company performs repeatedly.
With this definition, Enterprise Software has a whole new, largely unpenetrated market to enter: that of small businesses, referred to as the SMB or SME segment. Such enterprise functionality has traditionally been beyond reach for a typical small business, for two major reasons:
- Cost (license, hardware, implementation, maintenance ..etc)
- Lack of IT resources (integrating applications, designing processes, dealing with multiple vendors ..etc)
SaaS is the right answer for both, since it allows the SMB user to start using the functionality without an upfront investment, does not require implementation, upgrades, maintenance, worrying about backups and security ..etc.
Of course several Open Source packages are available completely free, which is a perfect solution for the cost problem, but I think most of these packages are by geeks for geeks; i.e. you really have to be quite IT-savy to implement, integrate, upgrade them, and as we stated most small businesses simply do not have that type of resource. Yes, that means the Silicon Valley tech-startups are not a true representation of the SMB world 
Likewise, I don’t believe SOA, best-of-breed packages working together are an option for the SMB market, for the same reason. They will play an increasingly critical role in larger enterprises with a professional IT organization, but for a few more years SMB’s are far better off with integrated, All-In-One type On-Demand solutions.
Of the Web 2.0 companies Stephen mentions in Five Reasons Web 2.0 and Enterprises Don’t Mix two are offering Integrated On-Demand solutions:
- NetSuite
Stephen lists NetSuite along with Salesforce.com, and while they are in the same club, the significant difference is that Salesforce.com is only CRM, while NetSuite offers an integrated CRM+ERP package. They both are trying to become a “platform” via NetFlex and AppExchange, respectively. Both companies are definitely pushing upstream, going after the Enterprise market as in the first definition, i.e. large (or midsize) corporate customers. - 24SevenOffice
Coming from Europe this company is lesser known. They focus on the SMB market and offer a modular but integrated system with a breath of functionality I simply haven’t seen elsewhere: Accounting, CRM (Contacts, Lead Mgt, SFA), ERP (Supply Chain, Orders, Products), Communication, Group Scheduling, HR, Project Management, Publishing, Intranet. Essentially a NetSuite+Communication, Collaboration. I’ve taken their test-drive (currently IE only) and liked it. I would debate how they structure their menu-system, as functions like Product, Inventory, SCM are all hidden under Financials.
Back to the economics: if SMB’s could not in the past afford Enterprise Software, the same held true for the Software Industry: they could not afford SMB’s, since there was just no way to make the numbers work. The cost of customer acquisition vs. the very low license fees made it an uneconomical model, whether via direct or channel sales.
Once again, technology comes to the rescue: the Internet, and largely Search Engine Marketing changes everything. Joe Kraus, Founder of JotSpot and previously Excite sums it up:
“ Ten years ago to reach the market, we had to do expensive distribution deals. We advertised on television and radio and print. We spent a crap-load of money. There’s an old adage in television advertising “I know half my money is wasted. Trouble is, I don’t know what half”. That was us. It’s an obvious statement to say that search engine marketing changes everything. But the real revolution is the ability to affordably reach small markets. You can know what works and what doesn’t. And, search not only allows niche marketing, it’s global popularity allows mass marketing as well (if you can buy enough keywords). “
Another benefit of SEM is that while traditional advertising can pick the right demographic groups, it cannot pick the right time, only a fraction of the target audience is in “change mode”, looking for a solution. That’s the beauty of Search Engine Marketing: obviously if you are searching, you have a problem and are looking for a solution, which is half a win from the vendor’s point of view.
Small Business Trends recently published a survey on “Selling to Small Businesses”, which supports the increasing importance of SEM: “A full 73% of vendors attract small business customers through search engine results”
Finally a quote from Ziff Davis again: “Products for the long tail and SMB market, where 72 million businesses spend $5k or less each year, are a much easier play” Wow, I don’t know where those numbers come from, but if I were a SMB-focused software vendor, I’d certainly like them … there’s a goldmine out there. ![]()
Update (2/22): Perfect timing for this report to come out just now: U.S. SMBs to Spend $2.2 Billion on Software in 2006, Says AMI-Partners
Update (4/17): Interprise Suite (recently debuted at Demo 2006) claims to be “The FIRST Accounting / ERP / CRM Solution to Bring the Power of the Internet to Small and Mid-sized Business“. While I take issue withe the claim to be “first”, considering the breadth of functionality it’s definitely an option to consider for SMB’s .
Related posts:
Tags: 24sevenoffice, Accounting Software, business model, crm, Demand Generation, enterprise sales, Enterprise Software, erp, Interprise, Interprise Suite, Jotspot, netsuite, Open Source, oracle, Sales, salesforce.com, sap, Search Engine Marketing, SEM, small Business, smb, sme, TiE, web 2.0, web20enterprise
Salesforceless.com
Business, Customer Service, ERP / CRM, Enterprise Software, Marketing / PR, SaaS, Software, Startups, Technology December 21st, 2005
(updated)
Little did Jeff Clavier or Brad Feld know just how timely their posts on “Shared Nothing Architecture” would become in days now that the granddaddy of all on-demand software, Salesforce.com was partially knocked out for almost a day.
The Typepad outage that prompted Brad and Jeff write their piece was just storm in a teacup; this is the real thing, the Perfect Storm. Real business customers could not conduct their business for a day. That something like this would happen was inevitable, but didnt’ we all expect it in the form of a major Internet outage? After all, on-demand vendors are likely to do everything in their power to avoid such outages – or do they? In the case of Salesforce.com, the answer is probably a yes: Earlier this year, Salesforce.com announced it would spend US$50 million to set up redundant East Coast and West Coast data centers with rapid data replication and failover capabilities, an initiative it dubbed “MirrorForce.” (source: IDG).
That’s exactly the kind of commitment Brad and Jeff are asking for, and not all (smaller) providers can afford it. Not that they all should… their core competency being in developing innvative software, not running data centers, which should be outsourced to the “pros” like Vinnie Mirchandani pointed it out numerous times.
Back to our “Perfect Storm”, it will have an effect on the entire on-demand industry, since Salesforce.com is such an icon for this segment. SAP, Oracle etc… will no doubt refer to this “vulnerability” in their sales pitches. Rival NetSuite will not brag about it on their homepage, but their salesforce will likely be trained to point out to prospects why this could never happen to them …
What exactly happened is still unknown – which in itself is quite a customer communications fiasco on Salesforce.com’s part. I bet it will soon be fixed though: the company will come forward with an explanation of what happened, what they do to avoid it in the future, and what they do to accomodate their customers who suffered from the outage. My bet is on Marc Benioff – he will somehow manage to turn this fiasco into a PR victory.
Talk about communication, I am amazed the blogosphere is not abuzz with this story – in fact it’s hardly being mentioned, in sharp contrast to the recent Typepad outage. Isn’t this the type of imbalance Chris Selland and Brad Feld just complained about? Or is everyone out Christmas shopping?
Ohh… stores close soon .. gotta run now:-)
P.S. Salesforceless.com is a valid site – I just bought it. (not that I know what to do with it… )
Happy Holidays!
Update (12/21): Others on the subject:
- Jeff Nolan
- ZDNet
- TheStreet.com
- Chris Selland
- NevOn
- Digging In
- News.com
- Silicon.com
- The Stalwart
- NevOn
- Extranet Evolution
Update (12/23): Unlike Salesforce(less).com, TechCrunch is not mission critical software, just an extremely popular blog, yet when they have an outage, Mike finds it important enough to go public right-away. Way to go!
Update (12/31): Reuters talks about Web Services outages, citing Typepad, del.icio.us … etc, not even mentioning Salesforce(less).com. Funny… Nice-to-have services appear to be more important than mission critical business applications?
Tags: 24sevenoffice, Availability, crm, DataCenter, netsuite, On-Demand, oracle, Outsourcing, SaaS, salesforce.com, salesforce.com outage, salesforceless.com, sap, techcrunch
Ad-supported On-Demand ERP? No Way….
Business, ERP / CRM, Enterprise Software, Marketing / PR, SaaS, Software, Startups November 21st, 2005
(Updated)
Ad-supported content? Yes. Personal Productivity tools? Yes. Enterprise Software? No way. (IMHO)
There’s an interesting, Microsoft-induced debate at ZDNet re. the possibiliy of funding free On-Demand software via advertising:
- Ad-supported Windows and desktop apps?
- The ads are coming, the ads are coming
- Who could possibly benefit from ad-funded applications?
- Why does ad-supported software inspire such antagonism?
- Why not fund on-demand with … money?
It all started with Microsof app’s but from there it’s just a step to arrive to Gerge Colony of Forrester: “ I foresee a world in which even enterprise applications like financials, ERP (enterprise resource planning), and supply chain software will be advertising-funded.”
My take: that we have a lot of web-based content supported by ads is already a fact. Consumer software, personal productivity tools? Quite possible.
Enterprise Software is a different animal. Why? It is used by businesses, who have their own business processes and workflow. Clicking on ads would be a distraction from that business process, I can’t possibly see why companies would support it. True, there will be major changes in the delivery/ pricing model for enterprise software. When prices come down from the stratospheric heights set by Oracle, SAP et al and become more reasonable, a’la Salesforce, NetSuite, SugarCRM, 24SevenOffice, SmartCompany ..etc, my bet is companies would rather pay those prices then accept the productivity-loss caused by their employees clicking around the Net for hours a day…
Update (11/29) : SAP’s Jeff Nolan on Ad-supported Business Apps.
Tags: 24sevenoffice, advertising, Enterprise Software, erp, netsuite, On-Demand, oracle, salesforce.com, sap, SmartCompany, SugarCRM
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e9e28f51-07e7-4761-ae9a-4e55df9beafc)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3dcb8a9c-1db8-433d-aeb0-5088e0abad96)





Zoli Erdos